Share This Page

Rohanna qualifies for U.S. Women's Open

| Tuesday, May 14, 2013, 4:34 p.m.

Rachel Rohanna has played in U.S. Women's Open qualifiers before; she qualified for the 2011 Open.

So she knows that at a sectional qualifier, the difference between making the Open and missing out can be one shot. Rohanna thought she blew her chance at Butler Country Club Monday to qualify for the U.S. Women's Open at Sebonack Golf Club in Southampton, N.Y., June 27-30.

On her 32nd hole of the day — the qualifier is a 36 hole event — Rohanna took a triple bogey. But she rallied late to take second place and qualify for the Open. Only the top two women at Butler qualified.

Rohanna, who posted a 76 for her first 18 holes, was in good position heading down the stretch of her final 18 holes when she hit her second shot into the rough on the 32nd hole. Her next shot went just 10 yards. She put the following shot on the green but then missed a 2-foot putt and wound up with a triple bogey.

But two holes later, she posted an eagle to salvage her round and her spot at Sebonack.

“It always comes down to one or two shots,” she said. “The focus is so different at these qualifiers. It shouldn't be, but your playing to get into the biggest women's golf tournament in the world.”

Rohanna, a Waynesburg High School gradaute, missed the cut at the 2011 Women's Open.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.