ShareThis Page

Is 'Monday Night Football' a threat to 'Raw'?

| Friday, Sept. 13, 2013, 4:18 p.m.

@stunnin_steve82 How much of a factor will monday night football will hurt #raw with cena out? #TribWRESTLING

With John Cena or without him, “Monday Night Football” is a threat to WWE.

The popularity of football is so great. Professional wrestling has changed in terms of who it appeals to and how. The show doesn't contain content that's as appealing to the football audience like it use to when the show had a more adult rating and controversial content.

The invention of DVR also hasn't helped WWE. It's much harder to record a live sporting event like “Monday Night Football” and not have the results spoiled by one of the dozen stations running highlights or analysis.

DVR makes wrestling perfect to fast forward to the intriguing segments with recognizable names.

But hey, this is all what Vince McMahon wanted. He doesn't want to be in the wrestling business. He wants to be mainstream. He doesn't want another wrestling company as competition. He wants everything on television to be competition. Well, he's got it with the NFL.

@SnapRed1 Do you think the royal rumble will ever have to winners again like bret hart and lex luger #TribWRESTLING

1994 had two Royal Rumble winners in Bret Hart and Lex Luger because of the situation the company was in.

Hulk Hogan, Macho Man Randy Savage and so many other established names had departed and left for WCW. Luger and Hart were the top babyfaces carrying the company. It was the best business decision they could make to have both babyfaces getting title shots at WrestleMania in two separate matches.

This also allowed WWE to capitalize on Hart versus his younger brother Owen Hart. Simply put, WWE was relying on Hart and Luger for multiple storylines as they approached the big decade anniversary of WrestleMania.

The option is always possible again depending on WWE's roster dynamic. In this era, WWE usually doesn't have that many viable options for babyfaces who could win Rumble. Plus, having two guys win the Rumble should lead to both having a shot at WrestleMania. WWE now has the pay-per-view in February, something they didn't have in 1994, in between Rumble and WrestleMania. The event in February logically should decide who gets the title show.

@SwearingDavid Do you think there's a chance Batista or Jeff Hardy would return to WWE at some point within the years to come? #tribwrestling

I think it's inevitable both will be back in WWE eventually. I expect to see Batista in 2014 with WWE. I don't have a specific time or year for Jeff Hardy but I don't think Jeff and his brother Matt will ever be done with active wrestling until they get one final run or match in WWE.

Both Hardy's have done time in TNA Impact, Ring of Honor or both since leaving WWE. They know that while they might be getting paid or having fun ― to some fans they have left wrestling.

It's the same as Rob Van Dam. He had been in TNA for the last few years. He just came back to WWE this year. Fans were going up to him happy to see him “back” in wrestling.

He never left, but to so many mainstream fans, he did. WWE is what matters to a wrestlers legacy. Both Batista and Hardy know this.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.