Share This Page

LaBar: Power outage was highlight of WWE event

| Monday, Oct. 7, 2013, 12:24 a.m.
WWE.com
Antonio Cesaro shows his strength by swinging The Great Khali.

Three of my four highlights for WWE's Battleground pay-per-view:

1. The use of a new slow-motion camera for replays.

2. The entertainment involving the panel of wrestlers on WWE's pre-game show.

3. Watching Twitter explode with rage when WWE had a black technical-difficulty screen playing jazz music for almost six minutes.

That isn't good.

The fourth highlight (which was No. 1 in importance) was the Rhodes family against The Shield. It was a classic story told with great emotion, and the crowd was fully engaged. I got goose bumps more than one time during it.

Otherwise, it was a bad show.

WWE's ending saw nobody capture the vacant WWE Championship. Big Show came out and knocked out Daniel Bryan, Randy Orton and a referee. His music played, and the show was over.

Just to clarify: No winner, and no reveal of what side Big Show was on. He apparently was influenced at first by the evil authority but then had a change of conscience.

When the power went out, perhaps WWE should have packed it up.

I'm all for storytelling, and I love proper build. But this wasn't proper build, and nothing new was told in the story that I didn't already know prior to purchasing the event.

Once again, outside factors prevent a clean win for the WWE title between Orton and Bryan. This will put emphasis on the need for the next pay-per-view at the end of the month: Hell in a Cell. That will be the type of match for the title and to get a winner.

It's a poor excuse to have three pay-per-views in an eight-week span. It's a tough sell to ask people to order a third pay-per-view in that short of time span especially after nothing was must-see in the first two.

The World Heavyweight Championship wasn't any better. Alberto Del Rio retained the title. The backstage belief is Rob Van Dam is going to be gone for a few months per his plan to work in short-term time frames in WWE.

So who is the babyface for the title? It's bad enough there isn't a heel the fans truly care about as champion, but he doesn't have a hero now to challenge him.

A tag match was added last minute simply to show Antonio Cesaro's big swing move. Yes, a heel tag team put in a babyface spot where the fans cheer the show of strength, and they win the match because of it.

I'm fine with having Cesaro break away on his own as a face. If that's going to happen, have him lose or be isolated from the team. Don't have him win and the entire team celebrate to a chorus of cheers. They just got done delivering a prejudice, political speech.

CM Punk had a clever win over Ryback, which makes me mad. There is no need for Punk to win their first match. Where do you go from here? What credibility does Ryback have as a Paul Heyman guy?

The bright spot was the Rhodes family. They brought their A-game. They stole the show ... if it's possible to steal something that sucked so badly.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.