ShareThis Page

LaBar: Big week for future of WWE & TNA

| Thursday, July 31, 2014, 10:39 p.m.

It's been a week to remember in the wrestling world with the future of WWE and TNA penning critical chapters.

The week started with TMZ, and other outlets reporting Spike TV is done with TNA Impact Wrestling once the contract expires in October.

TNA had been using Vince Russo in secret as a creative consultant. Every so often, TNA would fly the controversial and longtime creative writer to the company headquarters in Nashville, Tenn., for his services.

Spike TV doesn't like Russo and reportedly this was the straw that broke the TNA camel's back. If Russo was the straw, Dixie Carter is the haystack.

I believe Spike and/or TNA is using Russo as a scapegoat. Spike is using him to get out of the money-bleeding relationship with the wrestling company or to have Carter and TNA to save face that it wasn't their fault.

TNA does get a million viewers, which is valuable in the television world. The problem is the ends aren't justifying the means. Spike isn't making back the money it costs to have TNA. The attendance for TNA continues to decrease, showing no signs of the brand growing.

The latest update is supposedly negotiations are technically still going on, but I don't see how the two stay together. If Spike does another contract with TNA, it will be for less money and TNA's already having trouble making ends meet. If TNA gets a new deal with a new network, it has no leverage to get more money than it could from Spike. Either way, the inevitable is being delayed.

TNA and Russo officially have parted ways.

By the way, I'd take Vince Russo over Dixie Carter to run my wrestling company any day of the week. Russo can succeed if given the proper supporting cast and situation. Carter can't.

Everybody loves Dixie as a person. She's a good looking, friendly woman. A lot of wrestlers go on the record saying how sweet she can be. They talk about how she builds a relationship with them and their families. That's all great for the Christmas party, but you never see a quote about her ability to successfully run a wrestling brand while being as involved as she is.

Unfortunately for Russo, his legend outshines his creative talent. He's a strong personality and has proven he shouldn't be in a dictatorship. But, as I said, given the right team and players, he can be an asset.

I've spoke to several former or current prominent TNA wrestlers, and all agree with my point of Russo being a scapegoat. A few of them offered me stories of Russo being a good guy to work with from a talent standpoint. They pinpointed some of the best string of ratings TNA's ever had being when Russo was the most involved and the content was at its peak.

In Nashville, they're trying to keep a home; up in New York, they're trying to brand a new home.

WWE announced the latest financial figures for the WWE Network. By this time next year, the Network will either put WWE in its greatest financial situation ever or it won't exist.

The operation is about to go international over the next few months, which will be a major event in the history — or the eulogy.

WWE does well when it travels internationally. The product and genre isn't as over-saturated as it in America. Many international markets have to view the product at odd times in the day or basically do more work to keep up with the high volume of programming. The international WWE fans continue to be loyal.

It's because of this loyalty and reward the Network will be for them. I think the international audience is going to be a huge success when it comes to the number of subscribers. However, I also thought there would be a million subscribers in America by now, and I was very wrong about that.

WWE should hire Russo in case the Network fails and it needs a fall guy.

Justin LaBar is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-320-7949 or

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.