Share This Page

LaBar: Why Triple H is the WWE champion again

| Monday, Jan. 25, 2016, 12:03 a.m.

The outcomes of the matches at the Royal Rumble weren't a surprise to me or many others, but it is the best for business given the state of the WWE roster.

It had an excellent start and showing from Kevin Owens and Dean Ambrose to open the show. I expect big things from both of them at WrestleMania. Stars are injured, and spots were available for those two to step up and have a moment.

Charlotte retained her Divas title, and I feel every finish involving her father just looks awkward. I think she has the heat she needs, I'd prefer to not see Ric anymore with her. The appearance of Sasha Banks in what looks to be a solo role is the best use of her and it came in front of the NXT-based Orlando crowd which appreciated it and certainly enhanced the moment.

Rumble might most be remembered by many fans for the WWE debut of AJ Styles. It was smart to have him come in to the Rumble match early, keep him away from the end of it and the serious idea in fans' minds that he was going to win. That would have distracted from the actual finish. Also it was a smart move to have him eliminated by Owens to take that heat.

Of course, the night ended with the veteran Triple H returning to avenge the beating he took from Roman Reigns. He eliminated Reigns and went on to win the WWE World Heavyweight Championship for the 14th time.

On the road to WrestleMania with 70 days until the big show, that's more than enough time for one of the smartest performers ever to do what the business goal is. Triple H, along with Vince and Stephanie McMahon, will be able to generate the heat on them needed and interest in Reigns for his WrestleMania moment.

Triple H gets the heat as a character and knows how to manipulate the audience. Triple H also gets the heat as the executive who has just made himself the champ and what we assume is the main event of WrestleMania.

With the roster missing out on John Cena, Seth Rollins and Randy Orton — all are injured ­-- it's the best situation.

To enhance Reigns and the match, WWE needs to make the marquee event as sexy as possible. If the stars align, it will be Reigns, with The Rock and Ronda Rousey in his corner, versus Triple H with Vince and Stephanie in his corner. Toss in Stone Cold Steve Austin as the only sheriff in town who could referee and control that madness.

That, my friends, is a WrestleMania main event which gets the mainstream attention and could help contribute to 100,000 people filling Dallas Cowboys stadium.

Justin Labar is a staff writer for Tribune-Review. He can be reached at 412-320-7949 or jlabar@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.