ShareThis Page

Riverhounds defense stout again in draw at Rochester

| Saturday, July 22, 2017, 8:42 p.m.

On the bright side, the Riverhounds completed their three-game road swing undefeated. On the other hand, the Riverhounds finish the trip winless.

The Riverhounds' defense turned in yet another stout performance, but a lack of scoring punch forced them to settle for a 0-0 draw against the Rochester Rhinos on Saturday at Capelli Sport Stadium in Rochester, N.Y.

The tactics for the Riverhounds (5-7-7) were evident from the start — deny the Rhinos (6-3-8) the middle of the field and try to hit back with counter attacks. With just 43 percent of possession but an 11-7 advantage in shots, it seems the strategy worked for everything except producing a goal.

Coach Dave Brandt continued to try and find a winning combination in his lineup, this time bringing leading scorer Corey Hertzog and veteran Danny Earls off the bench while handing starts up front to young strikers Kay Banjo and Chevy Walsh.

The Riverhounds' best chances to steal a win late, however, came at the feet of Romeo Parkes, who was unable to get a shot away after Hertzog set him up on a counter with 10 minutes remaining. The broken play ended with a Steven Okai shot over the crossbar. When Parkes did put a shot on goal a few minutes later, his well-placed effort was snuffed out by goalkeeper Tomas Gomez with a spectacular diving save to his left.

Trey Mitchell, who missed the past month with a shoulder injury, returned in goal for the Riverhounds and needed to make just two saves for his fifth shutout of the season.

Next up is a short turnaround for the Riverhounds with a home matchup Wednesday against the Eastern Conference-leading Charleston Battery, a club they beat 2-1 earlier in the season in South Carolina. Despite being winless in their past four games, the Riverhounds remain just two points out of the final playoff spot in the East.

Matt Grubba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.