ShareThis Page

Much-needed win results in Keystone Derby Cup for Riverhounds

| Saturday, Aug. 12, 2017, 10:00 p.m.

The Riverhounds got a much-needed win and brought home a trophy in the process.

Romeo Parkes opened the scoring, and Chevy Walsh scored twice after halftime to give the Riverhounds a 3-0 win Saturday over the Harrisburg City Islanders, clinching the season series against their rivals to win the Keystone Derby Cup at FNB Field in Harrisburg.

More importantly than grabbing the annual rivalry trophy, the Riverhounds (6-8-9) won for the first time since June 22 — they were 0-2-5 in their past seven games — and climbed to a point out of the last playoff spot in the USL's Eastern Conference.

Though possession in the game was nearly equal, the Riverhounds put in one of their best all-around performances. They outshot Harrisburg, 18-10, and the City Islanders (6-12-6) put just two of those shots on Riverhounds goalie Trey Mitchell, who recorded his sixth shutout of the season.

Parkes opened the scoring in the 29th minute after intercepting a poor clearance attempt by Harrisburg just 30 yards from goal. The Riverhounds striker dribbled all the way to the penalty spot before placing a shot into the left corner of the net for his third goal of the season.

Walsh doubled the lead shortly after halftime by cashing in on a major City Islanders gaffe.

Corey Hertzog booted a long ball forward after a City Islanders corner kick, and Harrisburg's Paul Wilson attempted to head the ball back to goalkeeper Brandon Miller. The header didn't have the speed on it to get back to the box, and Miller, torn between handling the ball or trying to kick it, did neither, which essentially allowed Walsh to walk the ball into the net.

Walsh wrapped up the scoring with his fifth goal of the season, scoring from a corner kick that Kevin Kerr crossed to the back post for Parkes, who played a pass back across the front of goal to Walsh.

In addition to winning the Keystone Derby Cup by going 2-0-1 against the City Islanders, the Riverhounds also lead the standings for the Old Guard Shield, an informal competition institued this year between the five USL teams still in existence from the A-League, which ended in 2004. The Riverhounds are 3-1-3 in Old Guard Shield matches against Charleston, Harrisburg, Richmond and Rochester.

Matt Grubba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.