ShareThis Page

Ex-Seahawks 1st-round pick visits Steelers

| Sunday, March 13, 2016, 4:54 p.m.
Seattle Seahawks tackle Russell Okung (76) sits on the bench during the second half of an NFL wild-card football game against the Minnesota Vikings, Sunday, Jan. 10, 2016, in Minneapolis.

The Steelers may not be particularly interested in bringing back left tackle Kelvin Beachum, but they are in the market for a left tackle.

Russell Okung met with the Steelers on Sunday at the team's South Side practice facility. Ryan Harris reportedly will visit this week.

Okung played for the Seattle Seahawks, Harris for the Denver Broncos and Hairston for the San Diego Chargers. All are unrestricted free agents.

Okung, the No. 6 pick in the 2010 NFL Draft, confirmed the visit through a social media picture of the Steelers' six Lombardi Trophies.

“No decisions yet, but this is beautiful,” Okung tweeted.

Okung already has visited Detroit and reportedly plans to visit Houston on Monday.

Okung played out the final year of his rookie deal last season that paid him more than $48 million over five years. He likely would be inserted into the starting lineup over Alejandro Villanueva if the sides come to terms.

Villanueva started the second half of last season for the injured Beachum.

Beachum, who tore his ACL in October, started for the Steelers for three seasons and transformed himself into a solid left tackle.

But with it uncertain whether Beachum will return (he already visited the Seahawks and New York Jets and is visiting Jacksonville on Monday), the Steelers are trying to solidify the left tackle position that has only Villanueva and Mike Adams, who missed the 2015 season because of a back injury.

According to the NFL Players Association, the Steelers are $3.7 million under the cap. The Steelers likely would have to restructure a contract in order to sign a free agent tackle.

Mark Kaboly is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.