Steelers lose free agent CB Blake to Titans; LB Garvin signs with Redskins
The Steelers' secondary got thinner Thursday when unrestricted free agent cornerback Antwon Blake signed a one-year deal with the Tennessee Titans and reunited with former defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau.
The much-maligned Blake started all 16 regular-season games for the Steelers and finished with 76 tackles and two interceptions, including one he returned for a touchdown. However, Blake struggled in coverage. He allowed a league-high 1,028 receiving yards and 28 missed tackles, according to Pro Football Focus.
The Steelers re-signed William Gay and brought back Ross Cockrell, but have only Cortez Allen (who was benched the past two years) and second-year cornerbacks Senquez Golson and Doran Grant. Golson missed all of last year with a shoulder injury, and Grant spent the majority of the season on the practice squad.
Brandon Boykin, who the Steelers traded for in August, is still a free agent. The Steelers finished 31st in the NFL against the pass last year.
Also Thursday, the Steelers lost reserve linebacker Terence Garvin, a West Virginia product. Garvin announced on Instagram that he signed with the Washington Redskins.
The Steelers weren't interested in bringing back Garvin, who didn't receive a qualifying offer from the Steelers as a restricted free agent two weeks ago, which allowed him to sign elsewhere.
Garvin played almost exclusively on special teams in his three years with the Steelers.
The Steelers have three inside linebackers with experience on the roster: Lawrence Timmons, Ryan Shazier and Vince Williams.
The Steelers have lost five free agents: Steve McLendon (Jets), Sean Spence (Titans), Kelvin Beachum (Jaguars), Blake and Garvin.
Mark Kaboly is a Tribune-Review Staff Writer. He can be reached at email@example.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.