ShareThis Page

Steelers coach Mike Tomlin reserves comment on anthem protests, Charlottesville

Chris Adamski
| Friday, Aug. 18, 2017, 12:57 p.m.
Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin watches during mini camp Tuesday, June 13, 2107 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers head coach Mike Tomlin watches during mini camp Tuesday, June 13, 2107 at UPMC Rooney Sports Complex.

During his third and final news conference of the 2017 training camp on the Steelers' final day at St. Vincent College, coach Mike Tomlin discussed Sunday's preseason game, his players' health and some depth chart-related issues.

One topic he would not discuss? The handful of players across the league who are staging protests during the playing of the national anthem before games.

Asked if he has or will address the issue to his team, Tomlin gave a succinct answer: “I won't.”

Pressed on his reaction to the protests, Tomlin said, “I have no reaction. You know, a lot of people have personal opinions, and it's just that — it's personal opinions. If I don't think mine adds any value to the discussion, I will keep it to myself and not add it to the fray.”

A few minutes later and more than midway through his 11-minute remarks, Tomlin was asked one more time, this time specifically about how the events in Charlottesville, Va., last weekend affected him personally, Tomlin said: “Again, I've got no comment.”

Throughout last season, no Steelers were known to have sat, kneeled, raised a fist or showed any other sort of protest during the playing of the pregame anthem. It was during the preseason last year that then-San Francisco 49ers quarterback Colin Kaepernick became the first known player to sit during the anthem.

Kaepernick said he was doing it to protest the treatment of minorities and police brutality. A handful of players leaguewide staged similar silent protests throughout the season.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.