ShareThis Page

Steelers notebook: Polaroid tells story of Vikings' last win in Pittsburgh

Joe Rutter
| Saturday, Sept. 16, 2017, 5:39 p.m.
Steelers head coach Bill Cowher yells during the Bengals game at Paul Brown Stadium Dec. 31, 2006. chaz palla
Steelers head coach Bill Cowher yells during the Bengals game at Paul Brown Stadium Dec. 31, 2006. chaz palla

Thanks to the NFL's rotating scheduling system, the Minnesota Vikings don't visit often.

The Vikings, in fact, have made just two trips to Heinz Field, losing here in 2001 and '09.

The last time Minnesota won in Pittsburgh was in 1995 at Three Rivers Stadium. The final score, 44-24, might not be memorable, but what transpired at the end of the first half in the game was picture perfect.

That was when Steelers coach Bill Cowher angrily stuffed a Polaroid print in the shirt pocket of referee Gordon McCarter.

The Vikings were leading 10-6 as the clock wound down in the half. Fuad Reveiz attempted a 48-yard field goal that was no good, and the Steelers thought the half was over. But line judge Ben Montgomery threw a flag, citing the Steelers for having 12 men on the field.

Reveiz got another shot, from 43 yards, and put the kick between the uprights for a 13-6 lead. Cowher argued that the Steelers didn't have an extra defender on the field. Someone produced a Polaroid from an overhead camera that showed Cowher was correct.

Cowher chased McCarter all the way off the field and, after a few attempts, stuffed the Polaroid in the referee's pocket.

“I've been here 3½ years and I've defended officiating, but it was a debacle out there today,” Cowher said after the game. “For the officials not to be able to count 11 people, that's a debacle.”

So was the Steelers' second-half play. The Vikings scored 24 points in the third quarter to take a 37-6 lead.

If the Vikings pull off a similar feat Sunday, it shouldn't be taken as a sign of gloom and doom. In 1995, after the Steelers lost to the Vikings, they went on to play in the Super Bowl for the first time since the 1979 season.

Friendly rivalry

Vikings cornerback Xavier Rhodes is listed as questionable to play against the Steelers because of a left knee injury. Provided he suits up, Rhodes likely will be assigned to Antonio Brown, making it a matchup of former Miami Norland High School stars.

Brown, 29, is two years and three grades older than Rhodes. Like Brown, Rhodes was a star receiver in high school but was used in the secondary at Florida State.

“He's a great player, a physical guys, his arms come past his knees,” Brown said. “He's going to be a challenge this weekend.”

Remembering Dan

Before the game, the Steelers will hold a tribute to Ambassador Dan Rooney, who died in April. Steelers officials are asking fans attending the game to be in their seats by 12:40 p.m. for the tribute.

NFL commissioner Roger Goodell is expected to attend the game.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.