ShareThis Page

Steelers lineman Alejandro Villanueva lashes out at media

Joe Rutter
| Sunday, Oct. 1, 2017, 8:54 p.m.
Offensive tackle Alejandro Villanueva of the Steelers listens to the national anthem before a game against the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium on Oct. 1, 2017 in Baltimore.
Getty Images North America
Offensive tackle Alejandro Villanueva of the Steelers listens to the national anthem before a game against the Baltimore Ravens at M&T Bank Stadium on Oct. 1, 2017 in Baltimore.

BALTIMORE — No Steelers player was happier when the ball was snapped Sunday than left tackle Alejandro Villanueva.

And none was more upset with the media after the game against the Baltimore Ravens concluded.

Following the Steelers' 26-9 win at M&T Bank Stadium, Villanueva, a former Army Ranger who served three tours in Afghanistan, lashed out about the media's portrayal of last weekend's national anthem protests.

"To wake up in the morning and see a face of Coach (Mike) Tomlin and a face of a soldier pitted against each other is completely unacceptable from the media," Villanueva said. "To use me as a tool to push agendas and to push messages, that's completely unacceptable. I understand you guys are trying to make your money, but in our locker room, we are trying to win football games, and we are trying to be the best we can.

"I'm very close to my values and how the team perceives me, so I am pretty happy to be a member of Steelers Nation trying to represent the city of Pittsburgh."

Villanueva became a folk hero and garnered unwanted national attention amid the anthem controversy when he was the lone Steelers player to be on the field last Sunday during the "Star Spangled Banner" at Soldier Field in Chicago. Sales of his jersey skyrocketed in the days after the game.

"I'm not a hero," Villanueva said. "I didn't do anything in the military that was outstanding. If you were to compare me to my peers, I was just average. … It was just a very unfortunate chain of events that I think I tried to handle as best as I was able."

Against the Ravens, Villanueva was part of an offensive line that allowed just one sack of quarterback Ben Roethlisberger and contributed to Le'Veon Bell's season-high 144 rushing yards.

But Villanueva committed what he called a "stupid personal foul penalty," when he head-butted Ravens linebacker Kamalei Correa in the second quarter. For a play that started on the Ravens 12, the Steelers had the ball placed at the 31 after Villanueva's penalty, and they had to settle for Chris Boswell's 49-yard field goal that provided a 6-0 lead.

Villanueva was matched up against Ravens' pass-rush specialist Terrell Suggs, who finished with just an assisted tackle.

"What a better week to do it than against Terrell Suggs, one of the best in the business," Villanueva said. "Today was a good opportunity for me to get back to football. I thought my play improved significantly, which I had been working very hard on doing."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.