ShareThis Page

Steelers notebook: Eli Rogers might be back in role as punt returner

Joe Rutter
| Tuesday, Oct. 3, 2017, 5:24 p.m.
The Steelers' Eli Rogers reacts to a fumble recovered by the Bears' Sherrick McManis during a punt return in the first quarter Sunday, Sept. 24, 2017, at Soldier Field in Chicago Il.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers' Eli Rogers reacts to a fumble recovered by the Bears' Sherrick McManis during a punt return in the first quarter Sunday, Sept. 24, 2017, at Soldier Field in Chicago Il.

Eli Rogers' benching for fumbling away a punt return against the Chicago Bears might last just one week.

Steelers coach Mike Tomlin said Tuesday that Rogers might reclaim his job as the team's primary punt returner Sunday against the Jacksonville Jaguars.

Rogers, a third-year receiver, was inactive for the Steelers' 26-9 win against the Baltimore Ravens. Antonio Brown resumed returning punts, and Justin Hunter dressed for the first time this season.

“We'll see how the week goes,” Tomlin said. “I'll give him an opportunity. Like I told him a week ago, it's not a firing. It's a re-centering. He had a good week (of practice) last week. I'm sure he's excited about getting back there tomorrow.

“Decisions were made for that game. I'm open to role changing and evolving as we prepare for this week.”

Rogers' fumble led to a Bears touchdown and 7-0 deficit for the Steelers. He continued returning punts the remainder of that game.

Brown, the Steelers' main punt returner in recent seasons, returned two punts for 15 yards with one fair catch against the Ravens. Rogers has returned eight punts for 46 yards, a 5.8 average.

“He put the ball on the ground ... that's one his chief roles and why he's a participant,” Tomlin said. “I wanted to give him a week off and re-establish some fundamentals in that area.”

Rookie JuJu Smith-Schuster has taken snaps from Rogers at slot receiver and had three catches for 47 yards and a touchdown against the Ravens.

Of sound body

The Steelers will return to practice Wednesday without any nagging injuries from the Ravens' game.

“Just the normal bumps and bruises,” Tomlin said.

Worth monitoring are safety Mike Mitchell (hamstring), who missed his first game in four seasons with the Steelers, and tackle Marcus Gilbert (hamstring), who missed the past two games. Linebacker James Harrison also was inactive against the Ravens after missing practice Friday because of illness.

“He was feeling better Sunday,” Tomlin said, “but he had missed a lot of preparation time.”

No penalty problems

The Steelers remain one of the NFL's most-penalized teams. With 37 penalties, the Steelers trail only the San Francisco 49ers (39). The 316 penalty yards are tied for the league high with Kansas City.

Against the Ravens, the Steelers were penalized eight times, with six infractions called against the offensive line.

Tomlin said one factor was the officiating crew led by referee Walt Anderson.

“It's a widely known fact that that group throws more penalties than most crews in football,” Tomlin said. “Eight, per se, doesn't necessarily describe our quality of play. Certain crews have a personality. We know Walt and his crew call it tight, and they did.”

Tomlin was impressed the Steelers didn't commit penalties on punt and kickoff returns.

“That's a significant step in a hostile game like that,” he said.

Joe Rutter is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at jrutter@tribweb.com or via Twitter @tribjoerutter.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.