ShareThis Page

Steelers' Robert Golden, Darrius Heyward-Bay execute demoralizing fake punt

Chris Harlan
| Sunday, Oct. 22, 2017, 10:33 p.m.

In one hurried motion, Robert Golden took the direct snap and flung the football downfield.

No one will confuse his throwing mechanics for a quarterback's, but his fake-punt toss was nearly perfect.

"That's kind of how you have to do it," said Golden, the Steelers safety who connected with Darrius Heyward-Bey for a 44-yard completion in the fourth quarter of Sunday's 29-14 victory over the Bengals.

"We have a punt team out there, not an O-line, and I understand that," Golden said, "so you just try and get it out there."

The Steelers were protecting a 12-point lead with 6 minutes, 53 seconds left when the trick-play call came from the sideline. On fourth-and-7 at their own 40-yard line, the punt snap went to Golden, the up-back. Heyward-Bey, lined up as a gunner wide right, chased down Golden's throw along the sideline.

"You definitely want to put it out there a little bit and let him go get it," Golden said. "We've been practicing it for the last three or four years. We were able to connect on it tonight, that's all that matters."

The fourth-down conversion led to Chris Boswell's fifth field goal, a 25-yarder with 5:17 left. The pass was the second attempted by Golden in his six-year NFL career, and he is 2 for 2. He completed a 25-yarder in 2014 against the Browns.

"Robert Golden made a great throw," Heyward-Bey said. "He did all the work."

The Steelers spotted a Bengals tendency while studying their game last week against Buffalo, Golden said, so they knew there was a chance the fake punt would be called Sunday.

"We rep it all the time in practice, but you never know what's going to happen," Heyward-Bey said. "The opportunity was there, and we executed. That was the key."

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.