ShareThis Page

Steelers' JuJu Smith-Schuster suspended 1 game for hit on Vontaze Burfict

Chris Adamski
| Tuesday, Dec. 5, 2017, 2:06 p.m.

In the wake of Monday night's penalty- and injury-filled game between the Steelers and Bengals, it took less than 24 hours for the NFL to hand out a suspension to a player on each team.

Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster and Cincinnati safety George Iloka were given one-game suspensions for their respective fourth-quarter illegal hits during the Steelers' come-from-behind 23-20 victory.

In a release from the NFL, the league's vice president of football operations, Jon Runyan, noted Smith-Schuster violated the league rules that prohibit "unnecessary contact against a player who is in a defenseless posture" and "unsportsmanlike conduct."

Smith-Schuster, who turned 21 last month, delivered a penalized, blindside block to Bengals linebacker Vontaze Burfict then stood over him in an act that also drew a flag for taunting.

Cincinnati receiver A.J. Green called Smith-Schuster's play "a dirty hit" that was "not called for."

The letter Runyan wrote to Smith-Schuster to inform him of the suspension was released by the league. In it, Runyan noted "dangerous and unsportsmanlike acts."

"You lined up a defender and delivered a violent and unnecessary blindside shot to his head and neck area," Runyan wrote. "You then 'celebrated' the play by standing over him and taunting him. The contact you made with your opponent placed the opposing player at risk of serious injury and could have been avoided. Your conduct following the hit fell far below the high standards of sportsmanship expected of an NFL player."

Burfict, who delivered hits that caused season-ending injuries to Steelers stars Le'Veon Bell and Antonio Brown in the past, was taken off the field on a stretcher after the play.

Smith-Schuster appealed his suspension, but it was upheld by appeals officer James Thrash, according to an NFL spokesman. Iloka also appealed, and his case will be heard Wednesday by appeals officer Derrick Brooks.

Brown was the target of Iloka's hit on the tying touchdown with 3 minutes, 55 seconds left in Monday's game. The NFL said Iloka's hit violated its rule that prohibits "forcibly hitting a defenseless player's head or neck area with the helmet, facemask, forearm or shoulder."

After the game, Brown said Iloka "hit me in the head as hard as he could. I was grateful I was able to hold on to the ball."

Runyan wrote to Iloka: "The Competition Committee has clearly expressed its goal of 'eliminating flagrant hits that have no place in our game' and has encouraged the League office to suspend offenders for egregious violations such as the one you committed last night."

Monday wasn't Iloka's first run-in with the Steelers. In 2015, he was fined $23,152 for a helmet-to-helmet hit on former tight end Heath Miller. Last season, an open-field hit on former Steelers tight end Ladarius Green literally ended Green's career. Green did not play the rest of the season or playoffs and was released after a failed physical in the spring.

"The guy left his feet and hit me in the head," Brown said of Iloka, adding "karma" was coming for him.

Brown also repeatedly said Burfict being subjected to a hit was karma. Brown was knocked out as the result of a Burfict helmet-to-helmet hit late in a wild-card playoff game in Cincinnati after the 2015 season. Brown missed the Steelers' divisional-round game the following week, the only game of consequence he has missed in more than five years.

Burfict's history with the Steelers runs deeper, including kicking fullback Roosevelt Nix during the teams' October meeting this year.

Still, Smith-Schuster denied knowing it was Burfict when he delivered the hit after a reception by Bell. He also said he was "praying" for Burfict and acknowledged that the hit deserved a flag.

"All I saw was Le'Veon catch the ball," Smith-Schuster said, "and I was aiming for the first person to tackle him, and I saw a Bengal jersey. I didn't know it was him.

"I apologize for standing over him. That's not me. I'm better that. It's unsportsmanlike conduct, and I hope he feels better and gets well."

The incidents involving Smith-Schuster and Ilokoa accounted for three of the nine personal foul penalties called during Monday's game, the latest in a long line of chippy, hard-hitting meetings between the AFC North rivals in recent years.

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster taunts the Bengals' Vontaze Burfict after a big hit during the fourth quarter Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster taunts the Bengals' Vontaze Burfict after a big hit during the fourth quarter Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
Steelers receiver Antonio Brown catches a touchdown pass, as the Bengals' Dre Kirkpatrick and George Iloka defend during the fourth quarter Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver Antonio Brown catches a touchdown pass, as the Bengals' Dre Kirkpatrick and George Iloka defend during the fourth quarter Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster lays out the Bengals' Vontaze Burfict during the fourth quarter Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster lays out the Bengals' Vontaze Burfict during the fourth quarter Monday, Dec. 4, 2017, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.