ShareThis Page

Steelers' Ben Roethlisberger disagrees with JuJu Smith-Schuster's 1-game ban

Chris Adamski
| Wednesday, Dec. 6, 2017, 12:03 p.m.

A day after the NFL announced a one-game suspension for Steelers receiver JuJu Smith-Schuster and upheld it on appeal, a pair of veteran Steelers were split on whether the league discipline was just.

“I didn't think it was warranted,” Ben Roethlisberger said of the suspension of Smith-Schuster for a hard bock of Vontaze Burfict and standing over him to taunt late in the Steelers' 23-20 victory at Cincinnati on Monday.

“I thought maybe a fine, a pretty steep fine or something like that. I thought what happened happened in the context of a football play. It wasn't a hit on a kicker or a defenseless player. It was a guy getting ready to make a tackle – a much bigger football player. Obviously, we don't like the taunting, standing over him, things like that – I don't like to compare players and suspensions – but you look at what (New England tight end Rob Gronkowski) did and what JuJu did, and they got the same suspension. I don't know that that's necessarily fair, but that's above all of our pay grades.”

Gronkowski was suspended for driving an elbow/forearm into the head/neck area of Buffalo cornerback Tre'Davious White while White laid face-down after a play in which White intercepted a pass intended for Gronkowski.

In announcing the Smith-Schuster suspension, the NFL emphasized the after-the-hit taunt as much as it did the block itself.

Steelers veteran linebacker Arthur Moats empathized with that anti-taunting rationale.

“Do I feel like there should be a place for that in this league? No,” Moats said. “But at the end of the day, it's something he will have to learn from and the guys around the league will have to learn from. If you see this week, hey, if you hit a guy like that and taunt over him and will get suspended, I'm pretty sure guys won't be doing that this week coming up.”

“From the stance of sportsmanship,” Moats added moments later, “because we have been preaching that a lot, if you think about the platform that we have, if they see that not only are we having questionable plays happen but we are also taunting guys after the fact, that's not a good look for the league as a whole.”

Chris Adamski is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at cadamski@tribweb.com or via Twitter @C_AdamskiTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.