Share This Page

Steelers sign 2 draft picks to 4-year deals

| Sunday, May 6, 2012, 6:14 p.m.
Third-round pick Alameda Ta'amu apparently is still part of the Steelers' plans, as the team decided against cutting him Wednesday. Chaz Palla | Tribune Review

A busy weekend ended with the Steelers taking care of some business off the field.

The team signed nose tackle Alameda Ta'amu and running back Chris Rainey to four-year contracts Sunday, locking up two of their nine picks from the NFL Draft.

A cap on rookie contracts has made it easier for teams to sign their new players. The Steelers were allotted just over $28 million to spend on their draft picks over the life of the deals, and they shouldn't have a problem getting all of those players under contract before the start of training camp.

Ta'amu, a fourth-round pick out of Washington, and Rainey, a fifth-rounder from Florida, were among players who participated in rookie minicamp over the weekend.

Ta'amu is a potential long-term successor to Casey Hampton, who is in the final year of his contract and his recovering from offseason knee surgery. Rainey could give the Steelers a big-play threat at several positions, and he may get first crack to take over for Antonio Brown as the team's primary punt returner.

The Steelers traditionally have signed picks taken after the second round to three-year contracts. The collective bargaining agreement ratified last year mandates four-year contracts for all drafted players except for first-round picks. First-round picks sign four-year deals with a team option for a fifth year.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.