Steelers' Mendenhall ready to run in 2012
Rashard Mendenhall said he will play this season, and the Steelers running back didn't rule out doing so in theSept. 9 season opener in Denver.
“There's always the possibility,” Mendenhall said Wednesday. “I'll be back at some point. It's just a matter of what point that is.”
Mendenhall's future here has been murky, on several levels, since he tore the ACL in his right knee Jan. 1.
Steelers general manager Kevin Colbert has said it usually takes a year to fully recover from that injury. And the Steelers have braced for the possibility that Mendenhall will spend the first six weeks of the season on the physically unable to perform list.
Mendenhall is in the final year of his contract, but the Steelers' 2008 first-round pick plans on playing through whatever risk comes with returning this season. When asked if there is any chance he won't play in 2012, Mendenhall said, “I don't see that happening at all.”
Mendenhall, the Steelers' leading rusher the past three seasons, said he is still experiencing soreness and swelling in the knee he hurt in the Steelers' 2011 regular-season finale in Cleveland.
The 5-foot-10, 225-pounder didn't appear to be favoring it while running on the side during the Steelers' first two offseason practices, and Mendenhall said he has been cutting and doing other things that put him on track to return in 2012.
There is not a whole lot in the way of experience behind Mendenhall.
Third-year man Isaac Redman has shown promise, but he has made just two career starts. No other healthy running back on the roster has more than 25 career carries.
The Steelers are eager to see if Redman, who rushed for 213 yards in the final two games last season, is ready to handle an increased workload.
“Everybody here has confidence in Isaac,” Mendenhall said.
Scott Brown is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at email@example.com.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.