Steelers notebook: Six players shuffled to PUP list
By Mark Kaboly| Thursday, July 26, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
• The Steelers placed six players on the preseason physically unable to perform list to start training camp because of football-related injuries.James Harrison (knee), Max Starks (knee), Rashard Mendenhall (knee), Casey Hampton (knee), Jason Worilds (wrist) and Da'Mon Cromartie-Smith (shoulder) aren't permitted to practice with the team until they are removed from the PUP list. “Some of these guys who are close to coming off injuries, we want to get them in this setting, look at them, work them out, and be certain that it is something that is behind us before we proceed,” Steelers coach Mike Tomlin said.
• Tomlin said Hampton, who is six months removed from ACL surgery, could be taken off the PUP list before the end of training camp. “I'll let time tell the story,” Tomlin said. “It is going to be at least a week or two, but we will see.”
• Tomlin was impressed with the conditioning of rookie offensive linemen Mike Adams, David DeCastro and Kelvin Beachum during the annual conditioning test. “Those three guys ran extremely well, and that was somewhat surprising,” Tomlin said.
• Receiver Emmanuel Sanders battled injuries all of last year that kept him out of five games and allowed Antonio Brown to move up the depth chart. Sanders is hoping the injuries are behind him heading into his third training camp. “I feel good,” Sanders said. “Last year at this time, I didn't know about my health and if I was even going to make it through training camp.”
• Punter Jeremy Kapinos decided to change up his offseason workout regimen by introducing yoga to his workouts. “It sounds funny when I tell people I have yoga in the morning, but it is pretty intense,” Kapinos said. “I am definitely taxed afterwards.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.