Showers don't deter fans at Latrobe
• Coach Mike Tomlin talked of how the rain had cost the Steelers only one period of practice. Predictably, it poured for much of the Steelers' final practice at St. Vincent College on Friday. Still, the heavy showers couldn't keep fans from showing up on the final day of camp.
• Tomlin had expected punter Jeremy Kapinos to get in a few kicks during practice. Instead, he sat out again as Drew Butler worked mostly on his coffin kicks. Kapinos is still recovering from offseason back surgery.
• Running backs Chris Rainey and Baron Batch had plenty of reps both in the run and pass game. While Batch ran mostly between the tackles, Rainey worked on timing a pitch play and the quick screen. The sometimes slippery field didn't affect Rainey's style.
• With tight end David Johnson lost for the season, Wes Saunders appeared the most comfortable among the tight ends trying to transition to fullback. He was the lead blocker on several plays, while newly acquired Justin Peelle worked on timing routes. Saunders won't be available for the first four games of the regular season, so recently signed fullback Jason Ford got his chance to audition for a spot in Sunday's preseason game against the Colts.
• Offensive tackle Mike Adams returned to practice and worked mostly with the second unit. He showed few signs of the right MCL sprain.
— Ralph N. Paulk
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.