Roethlisberger's thoughts with Arians, Colts after Pagano news
• Ben Roethlisberger planned to talk Monday night with former Steelers offensive coordinator Bruce Arians, who became the Colts' interim coach when Chuck Pagano was diagnosed with leukemia. Pagano is not expected back this season. Roethlisberger and Arians talk on at least a weekly basis. “Our thoughts and prayers are with Coach Pagano and his family and everything that he's going through,” Roethlisberger said.
• Eagles quarterback Michael Vick can be difficult to prepare for because he can alter any play by tucking the ball and taking off running. He is eighth in passing with 1,146 yards yet has rushed for 130 yards and a 4.8 average. But he has turned the ball over, losing three fumbles and throwing six interceptions. “There's no time off with Vick. He always extends plays. We understand that,” cornerback Ike Taylor said. “He can scramble and run the ball and on the go, he can launch the ball 60 or 70 yards.”
• Because the Steelers were coming off a four-day break, they practiced Monday, something they normally don't do during the season. “(It) was kind of a bonus day,” Roethlisberger said. “It doesn't feel like a real week of practice yet. Once Wednesday comes around, it will feel real.” Next week, the Steelers will likely have only one full practice, on Tuesday, before they play at Tennessee on Thursday.
• The Steelers haven't given up more than 400 points in a season since 1988. They're on pace to allow exactly that many. “We haven't been executing very well at all, no matter if he (defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau) is calling the most basic forms of our defenses or some of them that take a little bit of thinking and experience,” safety Troy Polamalu said. “Whatever call he makes, we haven't been executing well at all.”
— Alan Robinson
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.