Steelers notebook: QB says lack of discipline not a problem
By Alan Robinson| Wednesday, Oct. 17, 2012, 8:09 p.m.
• Ben Roethlisberger said there's no lack of discipline under coach Mike Tomlin despite the Steelers' 2-3 start and the arrest of defensive lineman Alameda Ta'amu. “I think people are just comparing him to Coach (Bill) Cowher,” Roethlisberger said. “Every coach is a little bit different. ... Coach Tomlin is a players' coach. Guys enjoy playing for him. He gets after us. He just doesn't do it in front of you guys (the media), which is good.”
• Running back Isaac Redman, who has twice injured an ankle since training camp started, doesn't sound optimistic about playing Sunday. Redman hurt his right ankle after catching 105 yards' worth of passes in Tennessee, the most by a Steelers running back in 42 years. “When I sprained my left ankle (during camp), I was able to come back the next week. But I was able to compensate a lot on my right leg,” Redman said. “Now my left ankle is still pretty sore, so it's hard to compensate with my right ankle. I think it's going to be tougher for me to come back.”
• Left tackle Max Starks is encouraged by the progress of right tackle Mike Adams, who will make his first career start while replacing the injured Marcus Gilbert. “When we are in meetings, we point out key things for him … (we'll) do some extra work on the side to make sure we are both prepared,” Starks said. “It's just about making sure he is mentally sharp.”
• With Marcus Gilbert and Maurkice Pouncey hurting, former Pitt lineman John Malecki could be activated for a regular-season game for the first time. It would be meaningful to the former Franklin Regional High star, who has been cut by the Redskins, Steelers, Buccaneers, Browns and Titans. “Being from Pittsburgh, it's every kid's dream to put on a Steelers jersey on Sunday, so that would be pretty awesome.”
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.