ShareThis Page

Steelers look to reverse habit of squandering 4th-quarter leads

| Thursday, Oct. 18, 2012, 7:02 p.m.
Christopher Horner
Keenan Lewis (23) and Jason Worilds react after Lewis dropped a would-be interception during the fourth quarter of the Steelers' 26-23 loss to the Tennessee Titans on Oct. 11 at LP Field in Nashville, Tenn. (Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review)
Christopher Horner
Tennessee receiver Kenny Britt catches a touchdown pass behind the Steelers' Ike Taylor during the fourth quarter of the Steelers' 26-23 loss to the Titans on Oct. 11 at LP Field in Nashville, Tenn. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review
Christopher Horner
Ike Taylor kneels after taking a penalty during the fourth quarter of the Steelers' 26-23 loss to the Tennessee Titans on Oct. 11 at LP Field in Nashville, Tenn. The Steelers have squandered fourth-quarter leads in four of five games this season. (Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review)

If there were ever a team needing to sign up for Protecting the Lead 101, it's the Steelers.

Former coach Bill Cowher often talked about the fine line between winning and losing, but the Steelers' more immediate problem is getting to the finish line with the lead.

They have squandered fourth-quarter leads in four of five games, and they've lost after leading in the final quarter 11 times since they won the Super Bowl during the 2008 season.

The Steelers (2-3) need to find a reliable closer, especially if they're in another close game Sunday night in Cincinnati. Every one of the nine touchdown passes they've permitted came when they were ahead; and they've lost twice as each of their past three games was decided by a last-play field goal.

“If you look around the NFL, every game, every week, games are pretty close,” defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau said Thursday. “There may be one or two games that get a little bit out of touch, but most of them come down to that fourth quarter. There is no doubt you have to win your share of close games because you are going to be in a ton of close games.”

Last season, the Steelers were 4-1 in games decided by four points or fewer. This season, they're 1-2, while the AFC North-leading Baltimore Ravens (5-1) are 3-1.

“We weren't winning every game (in 2010 and '11) by multiple touchdowns or by two possessions. We were winning the games at the end,” safety Ryan Clark said. “We were making the plays, whether defensively, offensively or on special teams, that made the difference. Right now, when the games get into crunch time, we're allowing people to convert third downs. We're allowing people to score touchdowns in the red zone in the fourth quarter.”

Opposing quarterbacks are 27 of 41 for 319 yards, four touchdowns and no interceptions on those key third downs.

Their own offense isn't extending enough drives, which results in the defense being on the field too long. That leads to their secondary giving up too many drive-extending catches, in part because their pass rush isn't getting to the quarterback enough.

It's the classic cause and effect.

“All these games were really one-play games,” LeBeau said. “We have to be the ones that find a way to make a play at the end of the game that swings our way. These guys are going to fight through it, and we are going to come out on top. I am really confident in that.”

The Bengals' Andy Dalton has thrown 12 touchdowns but has been picked off nine times, three for touchdowns. Just one such pass that goes the other way might be what the Steelers need to end their run of fourth-quarter failure.

“He's had to throw the ball late when they fell behind against Baltimore and Cleveland, but it also shows they're putting the game in his hands,” Clark said. “You're going to have some mistakes when you do that, so we have to capitalize on them.”

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.