Share This Page

Steelers matchup: LB Lawrence Timmons vs. Redskins QB Robert Griffin III

| Saturday, Oct. 27, 2012, 10:20 p.m.
Steelers linebacker Lawrence Timmons plays against the Eagles at Heinz Field Sept. 2012. Chaz Palla | Tribune Review

STEELERS LB LAWRENCE TIMMONS vs. REDSKINS QB ROBERT GRIFFIN III

Matchup: Griffin III can turn a small gain into a game-changing play in a heartbeat with his legs. He's done so already this year, most notable against the Vikings when he ran 76 yards for a touchdown 53 seconds after Minnesota cut it to a one-possession game. Timmons (above) will be made responsible for not letting that happen.

Timmons: He is in the midst of one of the best seasons of his career. He has played in all but one of the defensive snaps this season and is among the team leaders in tackles (43), pressures (six), INTs (one) and forced fumbles (one). Timmons must be able to read the Redskins' option plays and not be out of position. Timmons won't spy on Griffin, but his speed will be needed to chase down the rookie quarterback from sideline to sideline.

Griffin III: Griffin already has the top four rushing games by a Redskins QB — 138, 89, 82, 74 — in his first seven games, as he has rushed for 468 yards and six scores. Griffin is able to make big plays happen, whether by himself or by RB Alfred Morris, thanks to the option. Washington has 39 runs of 10 yards or more — second most in the NFL behind San Francisco. Combined with Morris, the Redskins' rookies have more rushing yards than 30 of the other 31 teams in the league.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.