ShareThis Page

Steelers notebook: Woodley, Clark probable for Sunday vs. Giants

| Friday, Nov. 2, 2012, 7:36 p.m.
Christopher Horner
Steelers linebacker LaMarr Woodley returns an interception past the Bengals' Andre Smith during the second quarter Sunday, Oct. 21, 2012, at Paul Brown Stadium in Cincinnati. The Steelers' 24-17 marked their first road victory of the season. (Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review)

Steelers linebacker LaMarr Woodley, who aggravated an already tender right hamstring against Washington, is listed as probable for Sunday's game against the Giants.

Woodley practiced for the first time this week Friday. If he's unable to play, third-year linebacker Jason Worilds likely will get the start.

Safety Ryan Clark said he passed all of the concussion tests he took this week. He's listed as probable and said he expects to play.

Running backs Isaac Redman (ankle) and Baron Batch (shin) and linebacker Brandon Johnson (hamstring) also are probable.

Running backs Jonathan Dwyer (quadricep) and Rashard Mendenhall (Achilles) are doubtful, while safety Troy Polamalu (calf), tackle Marcus Gilbert (ankle) and linebacker Stevenson Sylvester (hamstring) are out.

Woodley, sidelined for seven games the past two seasons, said except for some soreness, he had no problems Friday.

“It's looking good. I've got another half day to prepare to get ready to go out there on Sunday,” Woodley said. “Most likely, I'm definitely going to give it a try.

“It hasn't been a major injury like the one last year. With the problems I'm having now, it's been easy to overcome.”

Worilds, slowed by injuries for much of his career, has been relatively healthy this season except for a sore wrist. As a backup, he has 13 unassisted tackles, a team-high three sacks and five quarterback pressures.

• Redman has missed the past two games with an ankle injury. Admittedly, it's been difficult for him to find his stride in practice. “I was a little sore in the beginning, but I've been alright once I warm up,” he said. “I'm excited to get behind the offensive line, which has been taking it to people lately.”

• Giants defensive end Justin Tuck told ESPN the Steelers' offensive linemen are benefitting from some loose officiating. For the most part, the Steelers were dismissive of Tuck's claim. “He's entitled to his own opinion,” guard Ramon Foster said. “If he feels that way, hopefully, we'll keep our hands tight and inside this week, and we won't have that comment next week.” Foster said most of his linemates probably feels the same way. Tuck told ESPN's Rachel Nichols that the Steelers have “gotten away with murder. They've done a very good job protecting Ben Roethlisberger; they don't hold on every play. But we've seen a whole lot of it.”

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.