Injury expected to sideline Roethlisberger for Ravens game
Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger has a significant throwing-related injury at the worst possible time — just when his team prepares to play the rival Baltimore Ravens twice in three weeks with the AFC North division lead at stake.
Roethlisberger, off to one of the best starts of his nine-year career, dislocated his sternoclavicular joint — which connects the sternum to the collarbone — on Monday night during the Steelers' 16-13 overtime win over the Kansas City Chiefs.
The injury, in its mildest form, adversely affects a quarterback's throwing motion, is extremely painful and can sideline a player for three to six weeks. Roethlisberger, who underwent MRI exams after the game and again Tuesday, also is being checked for a possible rib injury.
“You tend to know a lot more after four to five days,” said Dr. David Geier, an orthopedist and the director of sports medicine at the Medical University of South Carolina. “You see how long it takes the pain to settle down, and you'll probably have him do nothing for a few days to get it to calm down.”
The Steelers are 0-4 against the Ravens when Roethlisberger doesn't play.
Byron Leftwich, who finished the Chiefs game but has never started in four seasons with the Steelers (6-3), is expected to start against the Ravens (7-2) on Sunday night at Heinz Field. The teams play again Dec. 2 in Baltimore; the Ravens swept the Steelers last season to take the division.
“We just focus on the healthy guys,” coach Mike Tomlin said. “We're not looking to make excuses. Excuses are the tools of the incompetent.”
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.