Share This Page

Steelers matchup of the week: LB James Harrison vs. Browns LT Joe Thomas

| Sunday, Nov. 25, 2012, 12:01 a.m.
Christopher Horner
Steelers linebacker James Harrison against Cleveland Thursday December 8, 2011 at Heinz Field. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review

STEELERS LB JAMES HARRISON vs. BROWNS LT JOE THOMAS

MATCHUP: Joe Thomas and James Harrison have engaged in some epic battles, and there has been bad blood between them. Thomas accused Harrison of flopping three years ago after Harrison complained about being held. The two have had pretty even battles over the years. In eight matchups against Thomas, Harrison has only 2½ sacks.

HARRISON: He slowly has been working his way back into football shape after missing the first three games of the year with a knee injury. Harrison had his best game last week against the Ravens with five tackles, two pressures and just his second sack of the season. For the year, Harrison has 32 tackles, but he has been durable, playing in all but two snaps since his return.

THOMAS: He has been a workhorse for the Browns since getting drafted with the third pick in the 2007 draft. Thomas has yet to miss a snap in his six years, including 663 this year. Thomas is having another stellar season: He's allowed only two sacks in 409 pass attempts. Thomas has allowed quarterback Brandon Weeden to be hit only twice while being a dominant force in the run game with Trent Richardson.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.