Steelers suspend Mendenhall for 1 game for violating team rules
Steelers running back Rashard Mendenhall, barely seen on the field for weeks, is now invisible off it, too — and it will cost him a week's paycheck.
Mendenhall, benched after fumbling twice Nov. 25 in Cleveland was suspended one game Tuesday for violating team rules. He won't practice this week or attend Sunday's game in Dallas.
Mendenhall, who already knew he would be deactivated for a second consecutive game, wasn't seen on the sideline Sunday during the Steelers' 34-24 loss to San Diego at Heinz Field. It's team policy that players on the 53-man roster attend games, and nearly all watch from the bench area.
The suspension was announced about six hours after coach Mike Tomlin said Jonathan Dwyer and Isaac Redman would remain the top two running backs.
Mendenhall, a 2008 first-round draft pick and a 1,000-yard back in 2009 and '10, missed seven games because of injuries earlier this season. He has gained only 113 yards and, as unrestricted free agent after this season, is expected to sign elsewhere.
Tomlin said after benching Mendenhall that he would “get an opportunity to redeem himself,” but that hasn't happened.
The former Illinois star created a stir 18 months ago when he posted a message on his Twitter account questioning what really happened Sept. 11, 2001, and asking why Americans hated the late Osama bin Laden.
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.