ShareThis Page

Robinson: Opinions abound over the Steelers' lost season

| Saturday, Dec. 29, 2012, 10:58 p.m.
Christopher Horner
Dallas cornerback Brandon Carr intercepts a Ben Roethlisberger pass intended for Steelers receiver Mike Wallace during overtime Sunday Dec. 16, 2012 at Cowboys Stadium in Arlington, Texas. Christopher Horner | Tribune-Review

Welcome to Meaningless Sunday.

The Buccaneers, Browns and Raiders play meaningless games. The Steelers simply don't. Even when their late-season games don't decide a division title or a playoff seeding, they often serve as postseason auditions.

But for the first time since Heinz Field opened in 2001, the Steelers will play a means-nothing game there to end a season. (The only time they've had a losing record since Heinz Field opened, in 2003, they finished in Baltimore.)

Some younger Steelers will be seeing the stadium like they've never seen it before, with thousands of empty yellow seats and no game-time buzz. All that's to be decided is whether the Steelers go 7-9 or 8-8, if their winning percentage will be .438 or .500.

How did it come to this? There's an opinion for nearly every player in a locker room that won't be populated again by these very same players. A busy offseason will see to that. Some of those opinions:

They've got to work harder. Maybe it was the departure of follow-me players such as Hines Ward, James Farrior, Aaron Smith and Chris Hoke. But there seemed to be a sense of entitlement with some players, a feeling they were so gifted they didn't have to put in the extra time or do things the right way. Their teammates noticed.

They need to take care of business early. Games in September (and October) count just as much as those in December. Beat the Raiders and Titans early, don't start 0-3 on the road, and December wouldn't have been an uphill climb.

“Everybody needs to understand every game is important, the gravity of every game,” Casey Hampton said. “You can't take any game for granted. You have to go into every game the same way, and I don't think we did that this year.”

Don't be an offense; don't be a defense; be a team. “We weren't on the same page the whole year,” Mike Wallace said. “When you have the potential on the team that we had, the talent, for us to be one of the best, be the best, but you don't make it happen, it's frustrating. It just never came together the whole time.”

They must play smarter. How many times during the season did fans say, “How could they do that?” The Steelers were saying it, too, after every mental-error penalty, every poorly run pass route, every unexecuted block, every missed assignment. Deft execution isn't all athletic ability. It also results from preparation and mental alertness. (Exhibit A: New England Patriots.)

They must coach better. James Harrison didn't drop names, but he made it clear it wasn't just the players who underperformed this season. “We've got to do a better job as players of playing the game, individually and collectively,” he said. “And we have to do a better job as coaches, coaching the game and putting our players in positions to make plays.”

And making sure they never again experience Meaningless Sunday.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.