ShareThis Page

Robinson: Reading between the Steelers' lines

| Sunday, Jan. 13, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
The Steelers' Troy Polamalu plays against the Browns in December 2012 at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers' Troy Polamalu plays against the Browns in December 2012 at Heinz Field.

Sometimes it's not what a team executive says, it's what he doesn't say. Or as in the case of Steelers president Art Rooney II, it's the message within the message.

During his annual postseason interview, Rooney emphasized that he felt everything was on track with the Steelers' offense until Ben Roethlisberger was injured nine games in. And that turnovers — too many by the Steelers, too few by opponents — haunted them in the five games they lost by three points.

(He's right; 22 of their 30 turnovers came during their eight losses.)

But Rooney seems as perplexed as anyone why a team with the Steelers' talent is sitting on the sideline in January. And while he didn't chastise Mike Tomlin — who signed a contract extension only last summer — it was obvious that as the coach's boss, he wasn't satisfied with the playing or the coaching.

Some of Rooney's more telling comments, and how they could be interpreted:

• “When you sit here and look at the teams in the playoffs, we feel like we can play with those guys. .... You feel like if we had gotten into the playoffs, we could have been on the same field with those teams and been competitive.” So why aren't we on that field?

• “We have young players that need to get better, and they need to do everything they can to figure out how to do that, whether it's focus, whether it's conditioning, whether it's working in the film room. There's no question that players that work hard wind up being better players than players who don't work hard.” They'd better get better and work harder, and in a hurry, or they won't become old players with us.

• “Whether it's Rashard (Mendenhall) or Jonathan (Dwyer) or Isaac (Redman) or somebody else, we have to be better at that position, as well as others, but certainly at that position.” Somebody else should be expecting a phone call on Day 1 or 2 of the draft.

• “We obviously will look at the injury situation, our conditioning programs and all those kind of things and see if we can make sure that we have guys who can stay on the field longer.” Darn right we're looking at it. We devoted $33.2 million of cap space to just Roethlisberger, Troy Polamalu, James Harrison and LaMarr Woodley, and how often were they healthy at the same time?

Matter of consistency

Since 2003, the Patriots (126 wins), Colts (112 wins) and Steelers (103) are the only teams to win at least 100 regular-season games. No NFC team has done it, the Packers with 98 wins coming the closest.

But while the Steelers missed the playoffs four times over that span (2003, '06, '09 and '12), the Colts (2011) and Patriots (2008) sat out only once — and New England went 11-5 in the season it didn't make it.

The Patriots also are 10 for 10 in 10-win seasons since '03, the only team to do so. The one constant to the Patriots' success is Tom Brady, who continues to play at a high level at age 35; Rooney envisions his own quarterback doing that.

“Certainly when you look around at some of the other high-level quarterbacks in this league, they're still doing pretty good at 35 and over,” he said. “There's no reason to think Ben can't be that kind of player.”

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.