Steelers quarterback Charlie Batch has been named a finalist for the Byron “Whizzer” White Award that recognizes players who go above and beyond to perform community service in their city and hometown.
Batch, a Homestead native and Steel Valley graduate, is deeply involved in the community with his Best of the Batch Foundation that he started in 2000.
The foundation, which offers programs that directly impact the youth of financially challenged communities around Pittsburgh, is highlighted by Project C.H.U.C.K., a youth basketball league held in Homestead during spring and summer.
The “Whizzer” White Award is presented by the NFL Players' Association. White is a former Supreme Court Justice who also was a scholar, athlete, humanitarian and public servant.
“I am honored to be one of the five finalists for The Byron “Whizzer” White Award, the NFLPA's most distinguished award,” Batch said via Twitter. “Congratulations to all finalists. I'm proud to be in your company.”
During the annual NFLPA locker room meetings last month, players selected teammates to be recognized with NFLPA PULSE Awards for their community work. The winners — Batch and Ryan Clark from the Steelers — were invited to submit applications for the “Whizzer” White Award in order to receive monetary donations for their foundations or a charity of their choice.
A panel of peers selected five finalists from the PULSE winners. Finalists will receive additional charity donations, and the winner will receive an additional $100,000 for his charity.
Minnesota linebacker Chad Greenway, Chicago cornerback Charles Tillman, Cleveland tight end Benjamin Watson and Dallas tight end Jason Witten join Batch as finalists. The winner will be announced Feb. 1 at the NFLPA's State of the Union news conference at Super Bowl XLVII in New Orleans.
Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.