Steelers hire Aliquippa native as receivers coach
After spending nearly 30 years as an NFL assistant, Richard Mann finally is getting the chance to coach at home.
Mann, an Aliquippa native, was hired Wednesday as the Steelers' wide receivers coach — a position that will allow him to reunite with Mike Tomlin, who once coached with Mann in Tampa Bay.
Mann and Tomlin coached together with the Bucs from 2002-05.
Tomlin needed less than a week to fill the vacancy created when Scottie Montgomery left to rejoin the Duke University staff.
Mann, 65, returns to the NFL after spending the past three seasons assisting and consulting players before they went into the draft. He last coached in the league in 2009, which was his eighth and final season with Tampa Bay.
That year, he also served as the assistant head coach under former coach Raheem Morris.
Mann was on the Bucs' staff when they won the Super Bowl during the 2002 season. They had at least one 1,000-yard receiver during each of his first seven seasons, including former Pitt receiver Antonio Bryant.
Mann began his coaching career at Aliquippa in 1970. He later coached at Arizona State and Louisville before moving into the NFL, where he coached with the Colts, Browns, Jets, Ravens, Chiefs and Redskins. He is a member of the Beaver County Hall of Fame.
With the hiring of Mann, the Steelers still have one unfilled coaching staff position, which previously was one of two special teams jobs. Tomlin has not said how he will fill that position.
Since the season ended, the Steelers have hired Jack Bicknell Jr. to replace Sean Kugler as the offensive line coach and Danny Smith to replace Amos Jones as the special teams coordinator. Kugler left to coach UTEP and Jones took the same job with the Arizona Cardinals.
Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.