Former Steeler Harrison still without a contract
James Harrison remains a man without a team.
Harrison, the five-time Pro Bowl outside linebacker cut by the Steelers on March 9, was expected to take a physical for the Ravens in Baltimore on Monday, according to his agent. But it did not take place after the Ravens signed former Broncos defensive end Elvis Dumervil to a five-year contract worth a reported $35 million that includes $8.5 million — including a $1 million signing bonus — in 2013.
“I would guess that (contract) closed that down,” said Bill Parise, Harrison's agent. “They don't need two of those type (pass-rushing) players. I wouldn't expect anything there.”
Dumervil is the first major addition by the Super Bowl champion Ravens during an offseason in which they have shed eight starters, including key players such as Ed Reed, Anquan Boldin, Paul Kruger, Dannell Ellerbe and Cary Williams.
Dumervil, who has 63 1⁄2 career sacks, is 29, while Harrison, who has 64 sacks, is 35.
Still, Parise said he is “extremely optimistic that this will get done (with some team), I just don't know whether it will be tomorrow, next week or next month.”
The lack of a contract for Harrison to date partly reflects a market in which even proven stars such as running back Steven Jackson are signing for far less money than they likely would have commanded only a year or two ago. Jackson, coming off eight consecutive 1,000-yard seasons with the Rams, signed with Atlanta for $12 million over three years.
The Steelers released Harrison after the two sides could not agree on a pay cut that would allow the team to slice millions off its 2013 salary cap. Harrison was due to make $6.57 million in 2013 and $7.57 million in 2014.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.