Steelers bring in Georgia's Jones for visit
Jarvis Jones, an outside linebacker from Georgia who is expected to be a first-round pick in the NFL Draft later this month, was one of five potential draft choices who visited the Steelers on Tuesday.
Also brought in for personal visits were linebackers Jamie Collins of Southern Mississippi and Khaseem Greene of Rutgers, and safeties Jonathan Meeks of Clemson and Phillip Thomas of Fresno State.
Since Monday, the Steelers have brought in eight players for in-house visits, including five linebackers. Outside linebacker John Simon of Ohio State and inside linebacker Vince Williams of Florida State met with them Monday. They can bring in as many as 30 players for such visits.
Jones, a strong pass rusher, began his career at Southern Cal only to miss the final nine games in 2009 with a neck injury. He subsequently was diagnosed with spinal stenosis, a narrowing of the neck canal, and USC doctors would not clear him to play. He transferred to Georgia, where he finished his career.
Jones had 12 1⁄2 sacks last season, but the neck condition has left some teams wary of devoting a first-round pick to him.
Collins, Greene and Thomas are projected to go as high as the second round, and Meeks is regarded as a lower-round pick.
Thomas accounted for 20 turnovers during his college career and led the nation with eight interceptions last season. Collins turned in one of the top workouts of any player at the NFL Scouting Combine in February, running a 4.64 in the 40 and leading his position group in five categories. Greene is the half-brother of Pitt running back Ray Graham; he began his college career at safety but was moved to weak-side linebacker by former Rutgers coach Greg Schiano, now the Buccaneers' coach.
The NFL Draft is April 25-27.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.