Steelers' Tomlin added to NFL competition committee
Mike Tomlin will help make some of the rules his Steelers players dislike.
The Steelers coach was added Tuesday by the NFL to the competition committee, which is largely responsible for shaping rule changes.
Among those enacted by the league last month following a competition committee meeting in Arizona were a reworking of the Tuck Rule regarding quarterback fumbles, and a toughening of rules regarding players using their helmets to gain a physical advantage, especially running backs.
Tomlin replaces former Steelers offensive coordinator Ken Whisenhunt, who was recently let go as Cardinals coach.
“I am humbled and honored to be selected to the competition committee by commissioner (Roger) Goodell,” Tomlin said in a statement. “I am excited for the opportunity to help maintain and strengthen the NFL game, and I look forward to contributing any way that I can.”
Goodell said in a statement, “Coach Tomlin will bring additional strength to the committee from the coaching perspective. Mike has strong, perceptive views about the game and is effective in expressing them. We look forward to his contributions to the committee's ongoing mission to improve the game.”
Tomlin might find that the toughest opponents to any rule changes might come from his own locker room.
Numerous Steelers players have been outspoken against rules that attempt to take away from the physicality of the game. Former Steelers linebacker James Harrison was fined more than $100,000 for various transgressions, and safety Ryan Clark was fined $40,000 for a hit the Steelers don't believe was illegal.
Steelers players also voted against enacting the 2011 collecting bargaining agreement — they were the only team to do so — mostly because they disliked that Goodell remained in his role as the sole arbiter for some disciplinary actions.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.