ShareThis Page

Steelers take running back Bell with second-round pick

| Friday, April 26, 2013, 7:57 p.m.
Michigan State's Le'Veon Bell (24) rushes during the fourth quarter of a game against Northwestern ON Saturday, Nov. 17, 2012, in East Lansing, Mich.
Michigan State running back Le'Veon Bell (24) rushes for a touchdown against TCU during the second half of the Buffalo Wild Wings Bowl ON Saturday, Dec. 29, 2012, in Tempe, Ariz.
Michigan State's Le'Veon Bell (24) rushes against Nebraska's Eric Martin during the first quarter of a game Saturday, Nov. 3, 2012, in East Lansing, Mich.
Michigan State Athletics
The Steelers selected Michigan State running back Le'Veon Bell in the second round of the NFL Draft on Friday, April 26, 2013, in New York.

The Steelers proudly say they never draft to fill a need. Choosing Michigan State running back Le'Veon Bell in the second round of the NFL Draft on Friday seemingly contradicts that.

From general manager Kevin Colbert and coach Mike Tomlin on down, it was evident the Steelers' biggest need on offense was a running back durable enough to make a lot of carries but fast enough to get upfield in a hurry. Maybe catch a pass or two. And give the defense something to worry about other than Ben Roethlisberger's throwing.

The Steelers quickly identified Bell — who, at age 20, is a couple of years younger than many draft-eligible backs — as the best running back in this draft to do that. Even more so than Alabama power runner Eddie Lacy, who was available when they made the 48th overall pick yet was passed over for Bell, who ran for 1,793 yards on an FBS-leading 382 carries last season.

“It was pretty clear that this was the guy that we would be most excited about being available when it came to our pick,” offensive coordinator Todd Haley said of Bell, who had three 200-yard games while winning the Big Ten rushing title.

Colbert and Tomlin said much the same thing Thursday when the Steelers filled another major need by drafting outside linebacker Jarvis Jones of Georgia in the first round.

Of all the positions, running back might be the one where it is easiest for a rookie to come in and make an immediate impact. The Steelers, coming off their second-worst rushing season (1,537 yards) since the NFL went to a 16-game schedule in 1978, certainly need an impact back in Haley's offense, which relies on quick, accurate throwing and a balanced running game.

To Haley, Bell is capable of being a three-down back — even though the Steelers, only a few hours earlier, signed former Pitt running back LaRod Stephens-Howling, a third-down specialist and kick returner who had three kickoff return touchdowns for Arizona.

“It was a position that we needed to bring in some competition,” Haley said. “We have two totally different type guys with LaRod and Le'Veon. I'm excited. I think it puts us back in a place where we can have a chance to run the ball and throw the ball.”

Haley said Bell, despite all his carries, “doesn't have a lot of tread on the tire” because of his age and the fact he had far fewer carries the previous two seasons: 289 combined in 2010 and 2011.

And while multi-time 1,000-yard rusher Steven Jackson compares Bell to himself, Haley dropped in an Eddie George reference by saying, “He's taller (at 6-foot-1) than you would normally see, is a good athlete. We love the fact that he catches the ball really well, and he still has that big back presence.”

Bell weighed in the 240s last season, but he is currently at 230 as many backs drop weight in advance of the combine to help their 40 speed. He plans to stay there unless the Steelers suggest otherwise.

“He has a lot ahead of him,” Haley said of Bell, the first running back drafted by the Steelers in the second round since Sidney Thornton in 1977.

And, it can be suggested, Roethlisberger might have a lot bigger threat lining up behind him than he did last season when leading rusher Jonathan Dwyer managed only 623 yards.

“I'm going to come in and compete,” Bell said.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.