Steelers notebook: DeCastro's transition should go smoothly
Right guard David DeCastro shouldn't have a difficult time picking up the zone-blocking system installed by offensive line coach Jack Bicknell Jr. The linemen will block an area as a group, with an emphasis on double teaming.
“We did it at Stanford, and we were a big gap team like the Steelers are,” DeCastro said. “We've got the guys to do. It just takes practice like anything else. We'll be good.”
Here's an expression describing offensive coordinator Todd Haley that wasn't used often during his nearly three seasons as the Chiefs' coach: laid-back.
Haley is known for being demanding; he had a sideline flare-up with quarterback Kurt Warner while he was the Cardinals' offensive coordinator.
“He just wants to get it right,” wide receiver Emmanuel Sanders said. “Coach Haley has demands. (But) he's not too big on control. He just wants to be on the same page and wants to win.”
Picking up the pace
The Steelers will ramp up offseason work next week, when they will have four practices from Monday-Thursday rather than the three each of this week and last week.
Same as it ever was
Cornerback William Gay returned from one season in Arizona to find the Steelers' defense is pretty much the same one he remembers from 2007-11.
“Yeah, I know the defense. I never left the defense,” said Gay, who is projected to fill the nickel back role that Cortez Allen played last season.
Free safety Ryan Clark doesn't seem too worried about Allen making the adjustment from nickel back to starter as the replacement for Keenan Lewis. Clark felt Allen, a fourth-round pick in 2011, became an impact player by late last season.
“The more he played and the more he got acclimated to our scheme, the better we were,” Clark said. “When he played more toward the end of the year, he started creating turnovers and making plays.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.