ShareThis Page

Steelers sign top two draft picks

| Monday, June 3, 2013, 6:30 p.m.

They have a chance to start as rookies, a rarity for the Steelers. So, fittingly, first-round draft pick Jarvis Jones and second-rounder Le'Veon Bell signed four-year contracts hours apart Monday.

Based on the NFL rookie wage scale, Jones is expected to make about $8.8 million, with $4.8 million as a signing bonus. Bell's deal likely is to be in the range of $4.3 million, with a $1.4 million signing bonus.

Jones, an outside linebacker from Georgia, will get a chance to replace former Pro Bowl linebacker James Harrison in the lineup. He was the No. 17 overall pick in the April draft and, as the top pass rusher in major college football, was seen as a natural fit for a pass rush-heavy team like the Steelers that runs a 3-4 defense.

Jones had 14 12 sacks and 24 12 tackles for a loss last season. But he apparently injured a hamstring during his pro day workout, and he said recently he has been slowed a bit by it during the Steelers' offseason practices.

Asked Monday if he has seen enough of Jones to create a first impression, coach Mike Tomlin answered succinctly, “No.”

With the Jones and Bell contracts done, the Steelers have two of their nine draft picks unsigned: quarterback Landry Jones, a fourth-rounder, and defensive end Nick Williams, a seventh-round pick.

Bell, the Big Ten rushing leader last season with 1,743 yards, was the 48th overall pick. The Steelers passed up running backs such as Eddie Lacy of Alabama to choose the 6-foot-1, 244-pound Bell, who finished his Michigan State career with 3,346 yards and 33 touchdowns.

Jones and Bell signed two days after the Steelers freed up $5.5 million in cap space from releasing offensive lineman Willie Colon, who has since signed with the Jets.

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.