ShareThis Page

Steelers' Polamalu strives to regain status as elite safety

| Thursday, June 13, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
The Steelers' Troy Polamalu takes part in drills during minicamp Wednesday,  June12, 2013.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Steelers' Troy Polamalu takes part in drills during minicamp Wednesday, June12, 2013.

Troy Polamalu is 32, or eight years older than the Seahawks' Earl Thomas, who was acknowledged as the NFL's top safety a season ago.

Polamalu is coming off one of the most disappointing of his 10 NFL seasons, one in which he was on the sidelines more than he was at safety. The absence of one of football's true defensive playmakers didn't hurt the Steelers' No. 1-ranked defense statistically, but it certainly did psychologically.

“It doesn't take a rocket scientist to know we're better with Troy Polamalu healthy and on the field,” safety Ryan Clark said. “He's the best we have in this game.”

But 2012 certainly wasn't the best of Troy Polamalu, and he knows it.

It was the second time in four seasons he missed a huge chunk of a season — a knee injury limited him to five games in 2009 — and it raised questions about how fit he can stay and how well he can play the rest of his career.

And how much longer might that career last?

“I don't know,” said Polamalu, who is signed through 2014 to a contract that costs the Steelers more than $10 million in cap space each season. “I don't look beyond tomorrow's practice.”

Perhaps reflecting a time when playing into the late 30s isn't as uncommon as it once was, he insists that he and wife Theodora haven't discussed when it might be time to look to retirement.

“I hope I know (when it's time to quit),” Polamalu said.

“I hope I'm not scratching and clawing for a year (hanging on). I hope I can call it quits when I know it's time. But no, we don't talk about.”

What he does talk about, and with a measure of enthusiasm, is a transformed defense that shed James Farrior, Aaron Smith, James Harrison, Casey Hampton and Keenan Lewis in the past two years.

Polamalu likes incoming players such as safety Shamarko Thomas and outside linebacker Jarvis Jones, and the competition between Jones and Jason Worilds.

“It's real exciting,” Polamalu said. “We've got some new faces. It will be exciting to see the difference in our defense without somebody like James.

“We're going to have to evolve a little bit because we're missing a huge talent.”

Of course, defensive coordinator Dick LeBeau would be excited to see the difference in the defense with Polamalu healthy.

“Disappointing, I think, is the perfect word (to describe 2012),” Polamalu said.

“To have injuries, to not go to the playoffs, to not be healthy all year. It started the very first game (in Denver), torn calf muscle, so that was disappointing.

“But that was last year. Right now, all I can deal with is the present and maximize what I've got going on here now.”

Polamalu worked longer, harder and earlier on his offseason conditioning, understanding his body won't quite respond now the way it would when he was 22.

Asked how Polamalu looks, LeBeau said, “Tremendous.”

“I went into the offseason pretty healthy; the previous season I was pretty beat up,” Polamalu said.

Will it make a difference?

“Only time can tell,” Polamalu said. “Who knows?”

Polamalu wouldn't compare how he feels now and how he did in previous springs, saying, “What's important is how I feel in 16 games through the football season.”

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.