Rooney: Steelers interested in hosting NFL Draft
The NFL was forced to move the 2014 draft into May for the first time in 30 years, and if scheduling conflicts persist with Radio City Music Hall, the league hasn't ruled out moving the event out New York City for the first time in 50 years.
If that's the case, Steelers president Art Rooney II wouldn't mind being first in line to play host.
“Sure, I'd like to see the draft move around (to other cities), and I would love to see it come to Pittsburgh some time,” Rooney told the team's website. “It's a great event and attracts tremendous fan interest. It would be a fun event for Pittsburgh to host, and I think our city could do a great job with it.”
Pittsburgh has hosted the NFL Draft twice before — Dec. 19, 1947, at Fort Pitt Hotel and Nov. 15, 1948, at Hotel Schenley.
The NFL has held the draft in New York City since 1965 and at Radio City Music Hall since 2006. There has been no decision made regarding the dates of the draft beyond next year.
“A variety of alternatives are being explored, teams were told, including holding the draft at Radio City or at other locations, either in the New York area or in other cities,” the NFL announced last month.
The draft has been held at 31 venues in seven cities: New York, Chicago, Philadelphia, Milwaukee, Washington, Pittsburgh and Los Angeles.
Pittsburgh would make sense with its influential ownership of the Rooney family along with a strong fan base and a facility that can support such an event.
The NHL hosted its draft at Consol Energy Center last year.
The NFL draft is scheduled for May 8-10 next year, two weeks later than usual.
Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.