ShareThis Page

Against Giants, Steelers rookie RB Bell gets chance to show impressive camp no fluke

| Friday, Aug. 9, 2013, 10:24 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers running back Le'Veon Bell during practice, Thursday, August, 2013 at St Vincent College in Latrobe.

It's difficult to find anyone who has anything negative to say about Steelers rookie running back Le'Veon Bell's first two weeks on the job.

Except for Bell.

Despite coach Mike Tomlin rewarding Bell's eye-opening training camp with promised first-team snaps against the Giants in the preseason opener Saturday at Heinz Field, Bell doesn't understand what the fuss is about.

“I still don't feel like I am doing what I need to do,” said Bell, just 21 years old. “I feel that there is still so much more that I can get better at.”

He might be the only one who feels that strongly.

Just ask the running backs coach. “He's shown he is a violent and gifted runner,” Kirby Wilson said.

Or the veteran quarterback. “I've seen him show some kind of shiftiness, quickness, and he's made some guys miss, which is good,” Ben Roethlisberger said.

Or one of the linemen who blocks for him. “He has shown the tools to get the job done,” guard Ramon Foster said.

Or a linebacker he faces every day at practice. “He looks pretty darn good,” LaMarr Woodley said.

The Steelers used their second-round pick in April to select Bell in hopes of bolstering a stagnant running game that dipped to historically low proportions a season ago.

While the organization's initial thought was that Bell could find a niche to help the 26th-ranked running game, that notion has been altered.

Bell has flashed speed, power and quickness and shown he fits nicely into the Steelers' new zone-blocking scheme. But perhaps the most notable thing is something Bell hasn't done at all — make a mental error in blitz pickup or pass protection, which is unusual for a rookie.

“He knows 100 percent who to block, and he is executing at a very high level,” Wilson said.

Wilson has coached running backs for about 20 years and never has seen somebody so NFL-ready so soon out of college.

“He is doing exactly what we saw on film, and a lot of times that is not the case (with rookies),” Wilson said. “He is ahead of the curve in terms of what we are asking him to do.”

Bell rushed for nearly 1,800 yards and 12 touchdowns as a junior at Michigan State before forgoing his senior season.

Bell is trying to become the first Steelers rookie running back to start the season opener since Tim Worley in 1989. A good first preseason game could set him apart from incumbents Jonathan Dwyer and Isaac Redman.

“It doesn't mean anything to me how good I have been playing,” said Bell, who insisted that he has been overwhelmed at times. “I just want to get better each and every play. No matter what I do Saturday, I want to do better the next week and the week after that.”

Wilson said he is not as interested in Bell's statistics against the Giants as he is to see how Bell handles assignments and whether he approaches every play with a sense of urgency, something with which Bell has had lapses in camp.

“One play can't lose a game for you, but one can win a game for you, so we are trying to increase the awareness of every play to approach his assignment with 100 percent urgency,” Wilson said. “He is getting there.”

Bell quickly realized he is not going to overpower anybody in the NFL like he did in college, whether it is in the open field or picking up a blitzing linebacker.

“In college, I knew that there were a couple of times that I could just manhandle a linebacker and get away with it,” Bell said. “Here, I have to use my technique every time because he can beat me on any given play.”

If Bell can do that, he likely will get more reps with the first team beyond the preseason.

Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.