ShareThis Page

Steelers' Bell doesn't need surgery on foot

| Thursday, Aug. 22, 2013, 1:03 p.m.

Le'Veon Bell's final training camp summary: four carries, three injuries, one big scare, zero surgeries.

Bell, the Steelers' projected opening-day running back, is hobbling on crutches, his sprained right foot encased in a boot. About all the exercising he can do is walking and picking up marbles with his toes.

Still, Bell and the Steelers are encouraged by the prognosis from two medical teams that he won't need surgery and that his recovery is expected to come sooner than later. By contrast, tight end Matt Spaeth's Lisfranc injury required surgery to repair a tear.

Neither Bell nor the Steelers are projecting when he will return, but Bell hinted it won't be long.

“I feel like if my foot even gets close for me being able to play on it, I'm going to try to play on it,” Bell said Thursday.

This isn't the way a running back known for durability at Michigan State expected to begin his career: a bruised knee and sprained foot within two weeks of each other. But Bell plans to make the best of a situation that could be worse, although he said he is a frustrated at spending so much of his first preseason in the trainers' room.

“It's something I'm going to have to fight through,” Bell said. “Everything happens for a reason. I don't question the reason why I got hurt or the reason why I have to go through this. I'm going to take it and run with it and, when I get back on the field, I'm going to do what I can.”

Immediately after Bell was injured on his fourth and final carry Monday night against Washington, the Steelers were fearful he might be out for an extended period — if only because mid-foot injuries often require surgery and a lengthy rehabilitation.

“I can walk on it and put pressure on my foot now. When I first hurt it and I came to the sideline and took my shoe off, I couldn't put any pressure on it,” Bell said. “Now I can walk on it, move it, move all my toes, and the swelling went down.”

What the Steelers most wanted to hear is that Bell won't need surgery.

“That is encouraging news,” coach Mike Tomlin said. “It's great to hear that it is what it is, a mid-foot sprain and that it's perking up day by day. … The next time I get with the doctors, coming out of this next football game (Saturday against Kansas City), I'll get more information regarding where he is.”

Bell, the second running back taken in the NFL Draft in April, is aware he can't rush back; doing so might cause long-term damage.

For now, he is being listed as week to week, although it appears unlikely — such an injury puts considerable stress on the foot — he could be ready for the Sept. 8 opener against Tennessee.

“I know it's a long season, and I want to come back to where I can actually be able to play and not have to think about my foot,” Bell said. “I want to make sure everything is comfortable so I can go out there and actually play like I want to play and not have to think about my foot. I don't want to go out there and play injured and have the injury come back or get worse.”

Despite the multiple injuries, Tomlin said there is no worry that Bell — who carried 382 times at Michigan State last season — will be injury-prone as a pro.

“If you play football, you get hurt,” he said. “It's part of it.”

“It gets frustrating at times,” Bell said. “But I'm fighting through it and getting healthy as quickly as possible.”

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.