Jones released from hospital; Steelers cut 15 players
By Alan Robinson| Sunday, Aug. 25, 2013, 6:39 p.m.
Steelers first-round draft pick Jarvis Jones was released from a hospital Sunday after being treated for what apparently was a bruised chest.
Jones left Heinz Field on a stretcher Saturday night after being injured during the fourth quarter of a 26-20 overtime preseason loss to the Chiefs.
The team announced Sunday that test results for a more serious injury were negative. Jones posted this message on Twitter: “Thanks everyone for the support. I'm doing fine.”
Jones played a number of snaps with the starters Saturday, but was still in the game in the fourth quarter because the Steelers are trying to give the outside linebacker as much playing time as possible.
Jones appeared to be injured while falling on the football during an interception that was overturned by a penalty. It would have been the third turnover he was involved with in as many preseason games.
Jones' status for the Thursday night preseason game at Carolina is uncertain. The Steelers resume practicing Monday.
• The Steelers cut 15 players, including linebacker Stevenson Sylvester and running back Baron Batch, to get the roster to the league-mandated 75 players.
Linebacker Sean Spence was placed on the reserve/physically unable to perform list, and guard Justin Cheadle and cornerback DeMarcus Van Dyke were placed on the waived/injured list. Rookie defensive end Nick Williams was placed on the reserve/injured list.
In addition to Batch and Sylvester, the Steelers released tackles D'Anthony Batiste and Mike Farrell, wide receivers David Gilreath, J.D. Woods and Tyler Shaw, cornerback Ryan Steed, tight end Peter Tuitupou, quarterback John Parker Wilson and running back Jeremy Wright.
The Steelers must reduce their roster to 53 players by Saturday at 6 p.m.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.