Share This Page

Steelers-Titans matchup of the week: McLendon vs. Titans OL

| Saturday, Sept. 7, 2013, 11:03 p.m.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
Steelers nose tackle Steve McLendon practices Friday, Aug. 16, 2013, at St. Vincent in Latrobe.

Steelers nose tackle Steve McLendon has played his share of snaps over the past three years but finally will be the man in the middle this season in taking over for Casey Hampton. The Steelers have finished in the top five against the run eight of the past nine years.

Tennessee will test McLendon's run-stopping abilities with their newly acquired interior linemen of center Rob Turner and guards Chance Warmack and Andy Levitre.

McLendon: He has one career start and performed well while filling in for Hampton at Arizona two years ago. McLendon isn't as big as Hampton and will be the center of attention when it comes to Tennessee trying to run the ball. McLendon, an undrafted free agent out of Troy, didn't play more than 17 snaps in any game last season. He never has played more than 35 snaps in a game over his career.

Warmack, Levitre, Turner: The Titans did a lot in the offseason to improve a porous offensive line that allowed the second-most sacks in 2012. Warmack was a first-round pick, and Levitre signed a six-year, $46.8 million deal. Add veteran center Turner to the mix from St. Louis, and the Titans surely plan to use running back Chris Johnson more between the tackles.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.