Steelers' Taylor determined to make up for last year's showing vs. Titans
Ike Taylor has a knack for getting his point across quite clearly when breaking down the Steelers.
And that point?
“He always has that ‘he-thinks-he-is-better-than-me mentality,' ” defensive backfield mate Ryan Clark said.
That approach certainly seemed to work last year when Taylor allowed the second-fewest receptions (30) among cornerbacks who played at least 50 percent of the snaps until an ankle injury late in the year snapped his consecutive-games streak at 135.
Well, it worked except for when he played against Tennessee.
“You have some days like that,” Taylor said. “You are not going to dot every ‘I' when you are writing a story, and you are not going to cross every ‘T' when you are writing a story. And the crazy part is that if I don't, we get to talk about it.”
During a nationally televised 26-23 Thursday night loss to the Titans in October, Taylor was thrown at 13 times, allowed eight catches for 126 yards and a touchdown. He topped that by being called for three pass interference/holding penalties (one accepted).
“You never want games like that, and you don't want games like that to happen, but from that game on you have to be able to respond,” Taylor said.
Taylor allowed only six catches for 72 yards over the final seven games before suffering a season-ending injury in Week 13, proving he didn't let one game affect his season.
“There are days like that, and you have to put it aside and you just have to make sure it doesn't happen consistently,” Taylor said.
Taylor arguably has been one of the better cornerbacks in the league over the past couple years, but he might not get the credit of some of his peers because of two games: the 2011 AFC wild-card game against Denver when he gave up 204 yards, including the game-clinching 80-yarder to Demaryius Thomas in overtime, and last year against Tennessee.
“He said he didn't play well against Tennessee, and if he said that, he must've not played well,” linebacker Larry Foote said. “It just wasn't his day.”
Taylor will get to try and right that wrong Sunday when the Steelers open the season by hosting the Titans. He'll be pitted against the same receivers who made him look foolish 11 months ago.
“We watched the film and saw a couple of their guys talking and mouthing off after certain plays, and that's the great thing about football: You can correct that,” Clark said. “It's like ‘Quantum Leap,' and Sam Beckett going back in time and put right what once went wrong.”
If Taylor is going to right his wrong, he likely is going to have to do it against more than Kenny Britt.
Taylor has been following the opponent's top receiver since midway through the 2005 season when he was assigned to Cincinnati's Chad Johnson and held him to four receptions and no touchdowns.
Because Tennessee has such big receivers — Britt (6-foot-4), Nate Washington (6-1), Justin Hunter (6-4), Damian Williams (6-1) — Taylor likely will stick to playing the right side instead of following Britt.
“We rarely do it against Tennessee,” Taylor said. “I actually can't remember a time that we did.”
Last year, Britt was targeted seven times with Williams, Washington and Wright two each.
“Ike has a perfect cornerback mentality,” Clark said. “He feels that the next guy he plays against or the next game he is going compete well and do well. That's why you like him on the corner.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.