Running back Dwyer says he's returning to Steelers
Steelers offensive lineman Ramon Foster blocks for Jonathan Dwyer during the second quarter against the Redskins on Monday, August 19, 2013, at FedEx Field in Landover, Md.
Photo by Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
When Jonathan Dwyer was a surprising cut by the Steelers last week, he figured the last place he would eventually wind up was back with the Steelers.
But after a season-ending knee injury to LaRod Stephens-Howling during Sunday's 16-9 loss to Tennessee, the Steelers plan to re-sign their leading rusher from a year ago.
“Yeah, I'm coming back,” Dwyer told the Trib.
The Steelers decided to keep the recently acquired Felix Jones instead of Dwyer at the final cutdown to fill out a banged-up running back unit that would be without second-round pick Le'Veon Bell for an extended period of time.
Jones played only seven snaps against the Titans and did not carry the ball as the Steelers managed only 32 yards rushing on 15 carries.
Dwyer was the Steelers' first pick in the sixth round of the 2010 draft, and he had played in 21 games during his career with the team, with all six of his starts coming in 2012.
During that 2012 season, Dwyer led the team in rushing with 623 yards on 156 carries and scored two touchdowns. He recorded back-to-back 100-yard games - 122 on 17 carries in Cincinnati on Oct. 21, and 107 on 17 carries vs. Washington on Oct. 28.
Dwyer worked out for the Giants and Patriots since being released by the Steelers.
Mark Kaboly is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @MarkKaboly_Trib
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.