ShareThis Page

Steelers' Haley wants better execution from offense

| Thursday, Sept. 12, 2013, 11:39 p.m.
The Titans' Jason McCourty defends on a fourth-quarter pass intended for the Steelers' Emmanuel Sanders on Sunday, Sept. 8, 2013, at Heinz Field.
Chaz Palla | Tribune-Review
The Titans' Jason McCourty defends on a fourth-quarter pass intended for the Steelers' Emmanuel Sanders on Sunday, Sept. 8, 2013, at Heinz Field.

Todd Haley called it “the worst-case scenario.”

Maurkice Pouncey goes down after eight plays. LaRod Stephens-Howling follows.

The receivers can't hold onto potential game-changing passes early on.

The running game goes backward as much as forward.

Sometimes, as the Steelers' offensive coordinator said Thursday, a coach labors on a game plan for “120 hours a week” and everything works. Sometimes, the same amount of time is spent and nothing works, such as during the Steelers' 16-9 loss Sunday to Tennessee.

So what needs to change in the Steelers' offense Monday night in Cincinnati? According to Haley, just about everything.

“We're challenging everybody,” Haley said. “Nobody played the way we needed to play or the way we can play and expect to play.”

What needs to get fixed first — and fast — is a running game that managed only 32 yards and constantly put the Steelers into poor down-and-distance situations.

The challenge is doing that with the best run blocker (Pouncey) and top running back (Le'Veon Bell) hurt.

Coach Mike Tomlin promised earlier this week the Steelers are staying with the run. Haley said they would, too — but he's not promising how many times Felix Jones or Isaac Redman or Jonathan Dwyer will get the ball. Jones practiced extensively with the regulars Thursday.

The Steelers also want to re-install emergency center Kelvin Beachum as a blocking tight end, hopefully as early as Monday if newly signed center Fernando Velasco can learn the offense by then.

“Our coaches are working with him night and day,” Haley said.

It's not the rushing yardage total that matters, Haley said, but how many yards are gained in critical situations.

“You have to be able to run the ball efficiently, meaning that in situations you have to run, you're able to run,” Haley said. “I don't care if we throw it 45 times and run it 10 and win, or vice versa.”

It was a lost weekend all the way around for Haley, who is living in a South Hills hotel with his wife and five children while their house is being finished.

According to, he signed an autograph there last weekend that contained a derogatory comment about the Chiefs, the team he coached from 2008-10.

Haley denied he later got into a disagreement with the fan or his friend.

“The guy said, ‘I'm a huge Steelers fan.' So I signed it ‘Go Steelers,' “ Haley said. “Then he said, ‘No, not really, I'm a Chiefs fan.' So I wrote what I did in jest. It was funny. It was no disrespect to the Chiefs.

“I've never at any time said anything negative about the team that gave me a chance to be a head coach.”

He added, “I'm surprised that it's even being talked about when we have as big a game as we have.”

Alan Robinson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @arobinson_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.