ShareThis Page

Bengals' rookies do damage against Steelers

| Tuesday, Sept. 17, 2013, 12:48 a.m.

CINCINNATI — Many wondered what James Harrison might do against his old team Monday night. But the Bengals newcomers with the biggest impact against the Steelers were rookies Giovani Bernard and Tyler Eifert.

The Bengals' top two picks in the 2013 draft each came up with big plays to give a sometimes-erratic offense enough production for a 20-10 victory over the Steelers at Paul Brown Stadium.

Versatile running back Bernard, Cincinnati's second-round pick out of North Carolina, scored both Bengals touchdowns, the first two of his NFL career, on a 7-yard run and on a 27-yard catch and run as the Bengals evened their record at 1-1.

“It's always good to just get a win,” Bernard said. “That's how I am. Personal statistics aren't that much to me. We came out with a win, and we needed a win.”

Eifert, the first-round tight end from Notre Dame, set up Bernard's first score with the night's biggest play from scrimmage, a 61-yard catch and run through a gaping hole in the middle of the field in the first quarter.

The speedy 5-foot-9, 208-pound Bernard, effectively spelling starter BenJarvus Green-Ellis, carried eight times for 38 yards.

His biggest play came in the third quarter, when he slipped behind the Steelers' defensive line, took a pass from Andy Dalton across the middle and sprinted left, beating Pittsburgh's pursuit to the corner and skipping into the end zone to give the Bengals the lead for good, 17-10.

“I saw green grass,” Bernard said. “Once you see green grass, you've got to take it. There's not that many opportunities you get like that.”

“He did the things that we expect him to continue to do,” Bengals coach Marvin Lewis said. “He had the great catch and run, and the run earlier, and then Benny (Green-Ellis) comes in and kind of finishes it off. It was a great job by the two of them.”

Green-Ellis finished with 75 rushing yards, 35 in the fourth quarter as the Bengals put the game on ice.

On the Bengals' first score, it was Eifert setting it up and Bernard finishing.

After Bernard picked up 8 yards on a nifty cutback run, Dalton pump-faked and found Eifert sprinting all alone up the middle of the field for 61 yards, setting up the Bengals at the Steelers' 13. One play later, Bernard bounded in from the 7, plowing his way in after contact at the goal line.

On defense, the Bengals' biggest plays came not from celebrated free-agent signing Harrison — released by the Steelers for salary-cap reasons in March — but from veteran defensive backs Adam Jones and Reggie Nelson.

The Bengals already trailed 3-0 and were on the ropes when Steelers quarterback Ben Roethlisberger hooked up with reserve tight end David Paulson for a 34-yard gain to the Bengals' 13, a play that ended when Jones ran Paulson down from behind, lunged, ripped the football loose with his left hand and recovered it.

Officials originally ruled Paulson down by contact, but Lewis challenged, and the call was reversed upon review.

“Adam rebounded from the not-so-good play (getting beaten) to make a very good play,” Lewis said.

In the fourth quarter, Nelson made a diving interception of a pass behind Jerricho Cotchery that Cotchery tipped into the air, killing a Steelers' drive at the Bengals' 13 with 4:55 left in the game.

Harrison, a five-time Pro Bowler in 10 seasons in Pittsburgh, finished with no tackles.

Rory Glynn is a freelance writer.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.