Steelers notebook: Former Pro Bowl LB Reger dies
John Reger, a three-time Pro Bowl linebacker for the Steelers and Redskins in the 1950s and 60s, died Thursday in Tampa, Fla.
He was 82.
A native of Wheeling, W.Va., Reger played at Pitts and made the Steelers as an undrafted rookie in 1955.
He forged a 12-year career, making the Pro Bowl from 1959-61. He spent nine seasons with the Steelers from 1955-63 before spending three with the Redskins.
Reger intercepted 15 passes during his career, including three each in 1964 and 1966 while playing for Washington. He retired at the end of the 1966 season with 20 career fumble recoveries and two defensive touchdowns.
Quarter defense is back
Call it the return of the Steelers' 5-6 defense.
It went little noticed during their 20-10 loss Monday night in Cincinnati, but the Steelers used their quarter defense with six defensive backs on 19 downs.
Three safeties (Troy Polamalu, Ryan Clark, Robert Golden) and three cornerbacks (Ike Taylor, William Gay and Shamarko Thomas as a corner) teamed with two down linemen and three linebackers, all of whom were used as pass rushers.
“It makes us faster and it makes us quicker and it has a lot of people from the same (defensive backs) room communicating,” Clark said. “If you look back at the success we've had, the quarter package has been the best package we had.”
Bear of a matchup
The Bears are 20-7-1 against the Steelers, the best winning percentage of any Steelers opponent. (The Eagles, 47-27-3, own more wins than anyone but Cleveland).
The Bears can thank the 1930s through 1960s for that record; the Steelers are 5-4 against them since 1975.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.