Winless Steelers prepare to go overseas stuck in a 'deep hole'
Never has it been more evident that how Ben Roethlisberger goes is how the Steelers go.
And the quarterback who has won two Super Bowls and owns one of the top 10 winning percentages of all time hasn't experienced anything like this in his 10-season career.
The NFL is sending Big Ben and the winless Steelers (0-3) and Vikings (0-3) to play in the city of Big Ben on Sunday — and the way the two franchises are playing, the league must be wondering if London is far enough away.
With Roethlisberger turning the ball over four times on two interceptions and two fumbles — one of each was returned for a score — the Steelers fell to the Bears, 40-23, on Sunday night in the second-worst home loss of his career. The only bigger margin was a 31-7 loss to the Ravens in 2006.
Asked afterward if he's in shock at how this season has started, Roethlisberger replied, “Yes.”
He's not alone. The Steelers are a whopping minus-9 in turnover differential — they've turned it over nine times, their opponents none — and it's the major reason why they're minus-3 in the win column.
“It just comes from us not playing smart,” receiver Antonio Brown said, though he wasn't speaking directly of Roethlisberger. “Us guys, as individuals, have got to protect the ball. The ball is out there — it's our hopes and dreams — and we've got to protect it.”
History says a team starting 0-3 can only dream about making the postseason. The Steelers never did so the previous 12 times they were 0-3, and only three of 115 NFL teams (2.6 percent) since 1990 accomplished it.
Still, linebacker LaMarr Woodley said “it's realistic” the Steelers could finish 13-3. But probably not with their $100 million quarterback playing this way.
Roethlisberger, at least statistically, hasn't been the same since he injured his shoulder and upper chest against the Chiefs last season.
During his first nine games last season, Roethlisberger completed 66.1 percent of his passes, with 17 touchdown passes, four interceptions, 18 sacks and a 100.0 quarterback rating. The Steelers went 6-3.
In seven games since, he is completing just 58.2 percent of his passes with 13 touchdowns, eight interceptions, 22 sacks — plus six fumbles — and an 85.9 rating. And the Steelers are 1-6.
Roethlisberger's only comparable stretch was a five-game run in 2006 in which he threw seven touchdown passes and 12 interceptions, though the Steelers still went 2-3.
“We are frustrated and disappointed, but we are not going to lose our confidence,” Roethlisberger said. “We are going to have to put it together, and put it together fast, though.”
Roethlisberger underwent arthroscopic knee surgery in June, but he said he's in excellent shape after going through an extensive offseason workout regimen.
It hasn't helped that he's had only the semblance of a running game to support him; the Steelers haven't rushed for 100 yards for nine consecutive games, the longest stretch in their history, according to Elias.
Now, the Steelers and their quarterback must go through a two-continent work week to sort out their struggles. If they don't, they could be 0-4 for the first time since they dropped their first six en route to a 2-11-1 record in 1968.
“We are going to have to give it everything we got to get out,” Roethlisberger said. “It's a deep hole and getting deeper. (But) I'm not going to quit.”
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.